As I said previously, Trump on bathrooms

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

This has nothing to do with state sovereignty. Get off your high horse.

This is about a man who wants to be President, who stated he wants to change the GOP platform on abortion, who said he wants to raise taxes on the rich, who said that I'm discriminating because I don't want a pervert to go in the same bathroom as my young daughters, who believes PP is a good organization and has donated millions to liberal candidates and causes. This same man, as POTUS, will have discretion over Federal and SCOTUS Judges, along with input on legislation and bills submitted to Congress.

It is simply naive to believe Trump's views on perverts doesn't matter.

He made it clear that he fully respects State sovereignty on the issue. Yes or no?

Let me ask you, nDavid. do YOU respect State sovereignty on this issue or do you want a "Christian" president who openly interfere with a State;s right to choose? Why would you even want a President involved in such an issue?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

He made it clear that he fully respects State sovereignty on the issue. Yes or no?

No, he did not. While he claims the states should decide, he also said it was discrimination.

He will pack the courts with people who have the same perverted morals.

This is a guy who said his pro-abortion sister would make a great SCOTUS Judge.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Let me ask you, nDavid. do YOU respect State sovereignty on this issue or do you want a "Christian" president who openly interfere with a State;s right to choose? Why would you even want a President involved in such an issue?

You are missing the point entirely. You keep trying to make it a State rights issue when it's more than that. You're completely naive to the fact that this is already in the federal scope and that the opinion of the next POTUS is very important as to how this will play out.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

You are missing the point entirely. You keep trying to make it a State rights issue when it's more than that. You're completely naive to the fact that this is already in the federal scope and that the opinion of the next POTUS is very important as to how this will play out.

And if Trump is the next POTUS, what do you think he would do to influence this case?