Lee Stoneking Addresses UN

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

Dont get your magic hair tangled. You missed the first post captioned, identified the second, and missed the facebook page post. LOL but good start!

You're xxxxxxxxxx God overcomes. What is hidden He exposes. These two charlatons are a perfect example of that.

Post the caption which shows "my service." I don't see it anywhere.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by n david

Post the caption which shows "my service." I don't see it anywhere.

No need. You already noted that a picture taken from a play was relabeled as a service. That pretty much sums it up. Used that picture for over 18 months too. Yes, God does expose the hidden. Lesson: when you "borrow" something, dont present it as yours. It's unethical. Like making up fantastic stories of imaginary women locked in nonexistant caves is unethical. Small wonder these two work together. LOL

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

No need. You already noted that a picture taken from a play was relabeled as a service. That pretty much sums it up. Used that picture for over 18 months too. Yes, God does expose the hidden. Lesson: when you "borrow" something, dont present it as yours. It's unethical. Like making up fantastic stories of imaginary women locked in nonexistant caves is unethical. Small wonder these two work together. LOL

No need because you can't do it. You lied. There was no caption "my service."

Get over it. If he had posted a photo of an empty chapel, you'd still be screaming he was lying about something. He used the photo because he didn't think a muslim, an ex-upc'er and others would make such a big deal about it. If he wanted to hide something, he would have deleted the tweet.

"Lesson: when you "borrow" something, dont present it as yours. It's unethical."
Hope you express the same outrage to other churches, businesses, schools and government websites which "borrow" pictures to use on their websites. Most normal people understand the use of stock photos.

Much 'ado about nothing.

[Thinker]

Originally Posted by n david

No need because you can't do it. You lied. There was no caption "my service."

Get over it. If he had posted a photo of an empty chapel, you'd still be screaming he was lying about something. He used the photo because he didn't think a muslim, an ex-upc'er and others would make such a big deal about it. If he wanted to hide something, he would have deleted the tweet.

Much 'ado about nothing.

I totally agree
This Islam guy is a joke!!!!
HE POSTED HIS OWN PHOTOS - WHICH WERE MUCH BETTER and it was done without any of these guys on his back. It was right inline with what he is saying!!
But this Islam guy is on AFF to cause this kind of attack. He needs to be booted!!

Notice this Islam guy has posted lies about Wilson renting the chapel?? And has not posted one apology for his lies. Yet he accuses others.
This guy is ridiculous!!!

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by Thinker

I totally agree
This Islam guy is a joke!!!!
HE POSTED HIS OWN PHOTOS - WHICH WERE MUCH BETTER and it was done without any of these guys on his back. It was right inline with what he is saying!!
But this Islam guy is on AFF to cause this kind of attack. He needs to be booted!!

Notice this Islam guy has posted lies about Wilson renting the chapel?? And has not posted one apology for his lies. Yet he accuses others.
This guy is ridiculous!!!

We are not talking about his photos. We are talking about re-titled photos that were not what the title said they were. The first words he spoke about those retitled photos were a day after somebody busted him. That's what dishonest people do. Lie and when caught start damage control.

If these preachers don't want to be attacked they shouldn't make up claims about imaginary converts and they shouldn't use Muslims in the example of their lies. Lee Stoneking's lying tongue is what brought me to this thread. Running into the Wilson thing was just an interesting accident LOL

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

We are not talking about his photos. We are talking about re-titled photos that were not what the title said they were. The first words he spoke about those retitled photos were a day after somebody busted him. That's what dishonest people do. Lie and when caught start damage control.

No, of course you don't want to talk about his photos. Because that proves he's not a liar. It proves he is having services at the UN. It proves what he's been posting to Twitter is true. You don't want to talk about that. His photos prove you, Lois and the rest are a bunch of liars yourselves.

Responding to an accusation is what normal people do. He responded to the accusation. No one "busted" him. Some people who hate the message and hate what he's doing at the UN just wanted to try and assassinate his character in order to try and cast doubt on him and hurt his ministry.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

That's what dishonest people do. Lie and when caught start damage control.

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

Yeah you better change the subject far away from that time and date thing. LOL. Correcting a "stock photo" captioned as "my service" the day after someone else found it sounds like a real attack of moral conscience hahahahahahaha

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

He didn't have to specifically say "my service" to be deliberately misleading.

Speaking of lying and then starting damage control.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by n david

Speaking of lying and then starting damage control.

Speaking of a half-effort to divert attention from an exposed and unexplainable lie

Nothing i said and no rewording of my sentences changes those tweets nor does it change the fact that they were not acknowledged until they were discovered.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

If these preachers don't want to be attacked they shouldn't make up claims about imaginary converts and they shouldn't use Muslims in the example of their lies. Lee Stoneking's lying tongue is what brought me to this thread.

What proof have you that these are "imaginary converts" or that Stoneking has lied?

Oh, right, you have none. You're simply slandering a couple Oneness Pentecostal ministers because you hate their message and especially the fact that muslims are turning from their false prophet, and are being baptized and filled with the Holy Ghost.

[Walks_in_islam]

Originally Posted by n david

What proof have you that these are "imaginary converts" or that Stoneking has lied?

Oh, right, you have none. You're simply slandering a couple Oneness Pentecostal ministers because you hate their message and especially the fact that muslims are turning from their false prophet, and are being baptized and filled with the Holy Ghost.

The wives of bin laden in the cave story was a deliberate lie, just as posting pictures of a play and calling it a service a deliberate misrepresentation.

The real wives of bin laden were interviewed at length. Their names and stories are readily accessed. The cave story wasnt just a lie, it was a stupid one.