Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Regardless of how it is painted, the current President is simply fulfilling the role as the elected leader of the world's NUMBER ONE DEFENDER OF PEACE.
Many Presidents have done this before and many will do this in the future.
Don't think for a moment that his actions are weakening our posture.
As for the perception, name one country that's froggy enough to jump based on the idea that America doesn't have as many weapons as it used to so now is a good time to attack them?
|
Iran
North Korea
and several "non-states" like Somalia, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, al Queda, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
You can't.
|
Just did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
If/When America is attacked again, it will be for ideological reasons-- having nothing to do with thought that maybe America does not have as many nuclear weapons to defend herself now that President Obama is President.
|
When the United States is attacked again it will be because of those ideological reasons you stated.
If the United States is attacked with a nuke, it will be specifically because the Democrat controlled Congress and President Obama have banned the development of a single specific nuclear weapon - the "bunker buster."
They can git rid of hundreds of those shiny missiles and cruise warheads but we need to have about a half dozen bunker busters on hand. Obama and Pelosi/Reid have refused to even let development proceed on those.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Whatever the "right" can do to paint this guy in a negative light.....
|
You
and Barry seem to have forgotten how close Iran is. And, how they already operate 4 well equipped proxy armies throughout the world including a force in the Brazillian/Uruguay/Paraguay no man's land that was responsible for destroying a Jewish owned building in downtown Buenos Aires a few years back.
Yup. It would be good to let those guys have nukes. Don't need any clean underground bunker busters for that job. Nope.
Threaded Mode
