Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
Really? Jesus defended you when you were guilty? I thought you REPENTED so that you could be forgiven??? Where do you draw the line, Brother? You are supposed to be APOSTOLIC? And now you insinuate you are capable of defending someone you believe did WRONG in the eyes of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, whom you are supposed to believe in, supposed to even, in fact, carry HIS SPIRIT around?
My goodness, am I communicating with Holy Ghost filled people, or just intelligent elements of society? Please clarify. I'm astounded at times the discussions I have with people professing to have the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ dwelling in their bodies, their TEMPLES. . . .dare I write further and suggest. . .people who KNOW JESUS IS GOD and not a part of God???
We are to be a LIGHT amongst darkness, not join them!!!
Excuse me but if a child molester and rapist need defense then they should seek counselors who are like unto them. NOT those who are supposed to profess righteousness. Maybe you didn't understand my question, because to get those individuals charges dropped you would have to find loopholes, and therefore, lie.
Brother Benincasa
www.OnTimeJournal.com |
For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that,
while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
9Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
10For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
Look I understand that you don't know how the law works.
I have never lied for a client nor will I. Beyond the moral ramifications lying to the court could cost you your license, I get a list of attorney who lose their license in DC every month for lying to the court or their clients.
A loophole as you call it, means that the government cannot prove their case without using illegal means to gather proof. The fact is when a criminal is not convicted because the government broke the law what the defense attorney is really doing is protecting your rights against unlawful search and seizure, unlawful detention, etc.
We are a country of laws and we do our best to hold the government to those laws as well as the citizens. You may "know" someone is guilty but if you can't prove it with admissible evidence the law says he walks. Where do you think our Evidence tradition comes from? It comes from the OT.
In the OT law you could have an eye witness to the murder and guess what he walks on a technicality.
"At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death."
"This is a court of law young man, not a court of justice." Oliver Wendell Holmes
Threaded Mode
