Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
Of course ... and was it brought back to the table through legal channels and a constitutional process ... YES .....
Did the Supreme court re-examine Plessy vs. Ferguson - segregation- separate but equal ... do institutions re-examine failed policies even whe it was voted on by the majority????
This was last voted when ???? Are we going say that the U.S. constitution is a static document ... that everything that has to stay the way it is because of guys over 200 years ago got it right???
There is a process for bring up resolutions again in the UPCI ... either the right can play by the rules it wants to champion or stifle a democratic process that's HAPPENING TODAY.
|
Please explain what you meant by this post then, as from my point of view, you are saying that if someone is not willing to accept the majority vote, they need to leave, and should never have joined.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
If a minister who has joined a fellowship that makes collective decisions through a democratic resolution process cannot accept the will of the majority ... then ... no matter where they stand ideologically .... they have no business joining such an org
|
Threaded Mode
