Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old 04-28-2017, 11:50 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Libs are against free speech

Quote:
Originally Posted by n david View Post
All that blabbering and you still can't admit you were wrong about the bill.

No banning of speech.
No silencing of scientists

None of what you claimed was true. But that's typical of liberals. They get hysterical and make claims which are not true, hoping that their fearmongering will cause people to join with them.
You're either ignorant of the facts, or seeking to misinform our readers:

House Bill 819 (S.L. 2012-201), bans state and local agencies from basing its coastal policies on scientific models indicating an accelerating rise in sea level in favor of historical linear predictions. The law further mandates that the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) and the Division of Coastal Management do not define sea-level change for regulatory purposes prior to July 1, 2016. Additionally, the law directs the CRC to refine its study no later than March 31, 2015 with a scope not to exceed 30 years. While supporters of the bill argue sea level rise should be based upon historical trends and ask for additional scientific studies, ultimately, this bill prohibits the use of crucial scientific evidence and has the potential to harm North Carolinians on the coast.

Opponents argue that the law ignores scientific predictions of sea level rise in favor of economic gain. “We have serious sea level rise and we have a bill here that says the CRC can’t consider sea level rise while they are making their decisions,” said state Rep. Mary Price Harrison (D). The repercussions of North Carolina House Bill 819, should it extend beyond July 2016, could be devastating for the constituencies it intends to shield while opening up the potential for litigation in the event of disaster for failure of the government to properly protect its citizens. “By putting our heads in the sand literally, we are not helping property owners,” state Rep. Deborah Ross (D) told Reuters when the law was passed. “Ignorance is not bliss. It’s dangerous."

Source: Columbia Undergraduate Law Review
North Carolina Denies and Defies Science in House Bill 819
http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/culr/...ouse-bill-819/
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
America 2016: Free Speech for a selected few. Charnock Fellowship Hall 38 03-14-2016 10:14 PM
Free Speech Under Attack! deacon blues Political Talk 4 09-18-2012 05:01 PM
UK street preacher arrested for his free speech Apocrypha Fellowship Hall 2 05-03-2010 07:25 AM
Bill Clinton against free speech? Jaxon Fellowship Hall 3 02-14-2009 10:31 AM
Liberal's best arguments protected free speech Praxeas The Newsroom 0 05-26-2007 04:30 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.