Olbermann's One Lucid Moment on the "Mosque"

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by canam

Insensitivity and Provocativness have little to do with it , its a fact that the Muslims always build a mosque worship center at the "scenes of their greatest triumphs"

I don't understand how "it's a fact" that they do that means insensitivity and provocation have little to do with why

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by DAII

Olbermann NAILS IT!!!!

As always; DAII the provocateur.........

Olberman is just another wanna be liberal who wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the backside.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by RevDWW

As always; DAII the provocateur.........

Olberman is just another wanna be liberal who wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the backside.

KO is the liberal TV counter part to all those "crazy conservative talk show hosts" that use their imagination and inflammatory rhetoric to keep their jobs.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by DAII

Olbermann NAILS IT!!!!

He completely ignores the fact that the building on this site is where the landing gear from one of the planes crashed after exiting the tower, thus making this a part of "ground zero." He goes to great lengths to obfuscate. Truth and reality have always been KO's biggest foes.

Olbermann is so oblivious to reality that he fails to realize that the mosque he visits in Manhattan in his report has been vocally opposed to the ICC's cultural center. He deliberately leaves that important fact out. Why are American Muslim opposed to this building while foreign interests are so keen to push it down everyone's throat?

Olbermann fails to mention that this building is to be constructed with foreign funds raised by the ICC. He fails to appreciate the fact that the former leader of the ICC was forced to leave the United States in disgrace after blaming the 9/11 attacks on "the Jews."

Olbermann, blinded by his own arrogant rage, also fails to appreciate the fact that the current leader of the ICC blames the United States for the attacks on 9/11. (I documented this on the same Facebook thread where DA2 picked up KO's rant).

Muslim Americans oppose this thing. Shouldn't we be sensitive to their voices?

http://www.masjidmanhattan.com/

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by DAII

Olbermann NAILS IT!!!!

Dan, you're clueless.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Here's my version of this for Olbermann,

"THEY CAME FIRST and killed over 3,000 American civilians on 9/11,
and I didn't speak up because I felt safe and comfortable.

THEN THEY CAME to spread their ideology in my country,
and I didn't speak up because it wasn't politically correct.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews and vaporized Tel Aviv,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

STOP them.

I saw a fight when I was in high school between two of my classmates. I don't remember what the subject of the fight, but I do remember the "fight".

These two were arguing, and then it escalated to "let's get it on", the other said "OK, let me set my books down." While he was trying to set his books down the wiser of the two hit him hard square in the mouth. That my friend was the end of the fight. The moral of the story, preemption prevents long drawn out conflicts. The two became friends, but their was never a question, the hitter was not to be trifled with, they never fought again.

The bleeding hearts always, cause more death and destruction by trying to limit war, Germany and Japan got the message in WW II, finally after the peaceniks were silenced. But no more the strongest, most powerful nation on earth is weak, because she lacks the courage to believe that freedom should be defended with all necessary force.

Therefore, we have Vietnam, and Korea and Iraq and Gaza, the West Bank and Iran.

Libya also got the message!! But due to the leftist, anti-American, bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia, apologize to the Muslim world, "the strongest has become weak" and the "weak say we are strong". What utter garbage, and rank stupidity sits in our capital, too many congressmen and bureaucrats are bought and paid for by foreign interests.

[canam]

Originally Posted by crakjak

I saw a fight when I was in high school between two of my classmates. I don't remember what the subject of the fight, but I do remember the "fight".

These two were arguing, and then it escalated to "let's get it on", the other said "OK, let me set my books down." While he was trying to set his books down the wiser of the two hit him hard square in the mouth. That my friend was the end of the fight. The moral of the story, preemption prevents long drawn out conflicts. The two became friends, but their was never a question, the hitter was not to be trifled with, they never fought again.

The bleeding hearts always, cause more death and destruction by trying to limit war, Germany and Japan got the message in WW II, finally after the peaceniks were silenced. But no more the strongest, most powerful nation on earth is weak, because she lacks the courage to believe that freedom should be defended with all necessary force.

Therefore, we have Vietnam, and Korea and Iraq and Gaza, the West Bank and Iran.

Libya also got the message!! But due to the leftist, anti-American, bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia, apologize to the Muslim world, "the strongest has become weak" and the "weak say we are strong". What utter garbage, and rank stupidity sits in our capital, too many congressmen and bureaucrats are bought and paid for by foreign interests.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Jason Badejo

Dan, you're clueless.

The first actual person evah that admits watching Olberman. Audience of One. Dan is sitting at the feet of the great intellectual Olberman.

[CC1]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Danny,
It's always a good idea NOT to admit that you ever have listened to anything that Keith Olbermann says. It's almost like admitting that you liked Pee Wee Herman. It's just wrong, man! LOL!

It would be better to listen to Charles Krauthammer - "What happened was the President made a strong statement, hailed as a courageous one at the Ramadan dinner. But it wasn't a matter of courage. Courage would have been, at that audience, a Muslim audience, he should have said, "Yes, I believe in the legal right. You have every legal right to do it. But I would appeal to you as Americans -- after all, I'm the President. I'm not a judge, I'm not the Supreme Court, I don't decide on legality, but as President I speak on behalf of the spirit of America -- that you ought to consider the decency and propriety of establishing a house of worship dedicated to Islam at a spot where people were murdered in the name of Islam." Obviously, there's a distinction between the murderers and the religion, there's no question about that. But this is a place where you might want a nondenominational place of worship as you have in hospitals, a place of meditation. But establishing a mosque in that area is a provocation. The President should have said that. He didn't. He missed an opportunity. And I think he alienated all sides here."

[RevDWW]

Sure they can build the Mosque there, but should they. Is it an "in your face" or just a peaceful exhibition of Islam? Perhaps if we knew who is supplying the money we might be able to figure this out.