Can you tell the difference between men's pants &

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4

It wouldn't matter to a lesbian, transsexual or cross dresser!

The male cross-dresser wears long hair and dresses to identify with feminism ( and some of these don't even wear make-up because the distinction is in the clothing). The butch lesbian or female cross-dresser always wears PANTS to identify with machismo.

Clothing plays a large role enhancing their sexual roles. These abominations know the distinguishment between sexes while liberals and some moderates wonder off in the dark! HOW UTTERLY SAD!

Butch Lesbians wear MENS PANTS, from the MENS section.

[1Corinth2v4]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

Butch Lesbians wear MENS PANTS, from the MENS section.

I've seen butch lesbians wear these so-called female pants! Like is said, distinction!

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

I have seen some church suits this tight and to me that is just as bad. It's long enough, but it's not modest enough.

I would agree! My problem isthat our paradigm has changed for the worse. Instead of a society where the church tries to become seperate in distinction we have thrown off clear distinction for FIT! Sorry but FIT should be the last distintion. Again we went form a society that honored the roles of women and men to blurred lines in everything! THanks FEMINISM!

[jaxfam6]

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

see that is the problem you base MADE differently as acctable not matter how slight it would be. What is made different the zipper is on the opposite side? That is not clear distinction. The cut on most jeans for women are not appropriate and do not follow anything in the sense Paul used the term apparel. katastolē

Gee I wonder what you would have said about Jesus and his male followers and the slight differences in their robes and the robes of the female follwers?
I think slight difference can mean a world of difference.
Such as in these belong to a man and these to a woman.

I hate jeans on a woman but I have no issue with pants. I just think jeans are not feminine. If someone made a pair that was modest looking I might change my mind though.

[jaxfam6]

Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4

I've seen butch lesbians wear these so-called female pants! Like is said, distinction!

That is rich

Our neighborhood has a LARGE gay community. ALL the butch ones I see wear men's clothes. You must be seeing CLOSET BUTCH WOMEN. Ones that want to HIDE their butchness behind WOMEN'S PANTS.
Gay guys are much less likely to wear women's clothes then gay women to wear men's. Just an observation from those around the area where we live.

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by jaxfam6

Gee I wonder what you would have said about Jesus and his male followers and the slight differences in their robes and the robes of the female follwers?
I think slight difference can mean a world of difference.
Such as in these belong to a man and these to a woman.

I hate jeans on a woman but I have no issue with pants. I just think jeans are not feminine. If someone made a pair that was modest looking I might change my mind though.

Actually there was a very clear distinction of the two in Jewish culture. Also my main concern is the issue of a very formless type modesty where it does not bring reproach from men. If your read early Christian writing you will find this constant among the teachings. Women should hide such things from men not flaunt it or expose themselves or give reason for men to look upon them like that. If one truly loves his or her brother or sister this should not be the case as to tempt there weakness. Same goes for men and improper clothing.

[Pragmatist]

I voted no. There are some women's pants that are obviously feminine, but not all, and fewer men's pants are distinctly masculine.

I wear men's jeans because they fit me better, and are more modest. I don't think anyone's ever though they they were men's and not women's.

[1Corinth2v4]

Originally Posted by jaxfam6

That is rich

Our neighborhood has a LARGE gay community. ALL the butch ones I see wear men's clothes. You must be seeing CLOSET BUTCH WOMEN. Ones that want to HIDE their butchness behind WOMEN'S PANTS.
Gay guys are much less likely to wear women's clothes then gay women to wear men's. Just an observation from those around the area where we live.

Why do butch females feel the need to wear pants to prove their machismo? Why not just wear dresses?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by jaxfam6

That is rich

Our neighborhood has a LARGE gay community. ALL the butch ones I see wear men's clothes. You must be seeing CLOSET BUTCH WOMEN. Ones that want to HIDE their butchness behind WOMEN'S PANTS.
Gay guys are much less likely to wear women's clothes then gay women to wear men's. Just an observation from those around the area where we live.

a Butch is not a woman with short hair. A butch is a woman that tries to act and look like a guy. Maybe 1Cor confused the two?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4

Why do butch females feel the need to wear pants to prove their machismo? Why not just wear dresses?

Why do women that want to look and act like guys not wear dresses?