|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
05-08-2016, 05:44 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,416
|
|
|
Sinaticus problematicus
Hi,
The idea that Sinaiticus is a 4th century ms. is deeply entrenched in modern scholarship.
However, a little scrutiny, especially using the tools available since 2009 when the Codex Sinaiticus Project came online, shows us that the manuscript was actually written in the 1800s.
These two websites have been set up as an introduction to Sinaiticus, and they point to additional resources and discussions.
Codex Sinaiticus Authenticiy Research
http://www.sinaiticus.net/
Sinaiticus - authentic antiquity or modern?
http://www.purebibleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65
Steven Avery
Dutchess County, NY
|
05-08-2016, 05:47 PM
|
 |
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,744
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
|
05-09-2016, 06:28 AM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Wisconsin Dells
Posts: 2,941
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
The original post should have been placed on April Fools Day.
I may or not like a certain manuscript, my favorite ones shall remain unnamed, but I do not make light of those that I do not study.
|
05-09-2016, 10:12 AM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Pitta
The original post should have been placed on April Fools Day.
I may or not like a certain manuscript, my favorite ones shall remain unnamed, but I do not make light of those that I do not study.
|
Hope it's not the catholic Vaticanus or the Sinaiticus you favour, interpolated beyond belief.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
05-13-2016, 06:23 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,416
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
I do wonder if any of our readers would like to comment on, or discuss, the evidences that Sinaiticus is actually an 1800s production.
Steven Avery
|
04-08-2018, 02:50 AM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,787
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery
I do wonder if any of our readers would like to comment on, or discuss, the evidences that Sinaiticus is actually an 1800s production.
Steven Avery
|
Such as?
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
04-08-2018, 02:54 AM
|
|
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,744
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Such as?
|
Page 1, please.
|
03-05-2017, 03:27 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,416
|
|
|
Sinaticus -Claromontanus source of homoeoteleuton
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Pitta
The original post should have been placed on April Fools Day. I may or not like a certain manuscript, my favorite ones shall remain unnamed, but I do not make light of those that I do not study.
|
This was an interesting sniping-blindly comment.
Perhaps you would like to study and and comment on the homoeoteleuton that shows that the supposedly 350 AD Sinaiticus was copied using the Codex Claromontanus, dated as 550 AD.
Codex Sinaiticus Authenticity Research
Homeoteleuton - Text Omitted Because Of Similar Endings
http://www.sinaiticus.net/homeoteleuton.html
======================
More detail:
1. Presentation of a Textbook Case of Homeoteleuton
W. R. Meyer
https://app.box.com/s/jnbxtg8et442xtsobklq8k830bwpyvnw
2. A Layman's Guide to the Textbook Case
Steven Avery
https://app.box.com/s/teozkmv0ifshfwdjne4vsgkmjlzjs4sn
3. Description of the Discovery of the 1 Corinthians 13 Homeoteleuton
W. R. Meyer
https://app.box.com/s/2k4ihkp6op1appn4fw5egvsiw2kw01v2
======================
Steven Avery
|
05-14-2016, 02:43 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Wisconsin Dells
Posts: 2,941
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
|
03-11-2017, 07:03 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 14,649
|
|
|
Re: Sinaticus problematicus
If there can be 1500 years variance between people who study this what does that say for the dating methods? How certain can we be about all the dates that are proposed for different manuscripts or parts of them?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 AM.
| |
Hybrid Mode
