NOW - Rand Paul filibustering Brennen CSPAN

[Pressing-On]

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN2/

[Jermyn Davidson]

Listened to him for a few minutes...

Why doesn't he like Brennen?
Or is Brennen inconsequential and this is simply another way to get at the President?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Listened to him for a few minutes...

Why doesn't he like Brennen?
Or is Brennen inconsequential and this is simply another way to get at the President?

You haven't been following the story. I'd prefer you did the research. You should have known the content of this story before you commented. I don't have time for it. Sorry, Jermyn.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

You haven't been following the story. I'd prefer you did the research. You should have known the content of this story before you commented. I don't have time for it. Sorry, Jermyn.

Ok.
Thanks anyway.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Ok.
Thanks anyway.

"The freshman Kentucky Republican has said he will hold up the nomination until he gets more information about the U.S. drone execution program, which has become a major sore point for many lawmakers on Capitol Hill."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ion-cia-direc/

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

"The freshman Kentucky Republican has said he will hold up the nomination until he gets more information about the U.S. drone execution program, which has become a major sore point for many lawmakers on Capitol Hill."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ion-cia-direc/

I am glad this is happening!
Thank you!

[n david]

It started with Brennan refusing to answer whether or not the CIA would use a drone inside the US to target (and kill) a US citizen.

This isn't some partisan shot at Obama. I'm glad Rand Paul (and Ted Cruz) is doing this, and I'm incredibly disappointed more in Congress aren't pushing back against Obama's use of drones to target and kill American citizens without prejudice.

Atty Gen Holder says the Obama admin can use an armed drone to kill an American citizen on US soil...but they have "no intention of doing so."

Well bless their hearts, we can believe them can't we?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

It started with Brennan refusing to answer whether or not the CIA would use a drone inside the US to target (and kill) a US citizen.

This isn't some partisan shot at Obama. I'm glad Rand Paul (and Ted Cruz) is doing this, and I'm incredibly disappointed more in Congress aren't pushing back against Obama's use of drones to target and kill American citizens without prejudice.

Atty Gen Holder says the Obama admin can use an armed drone to kill an American citizen on US soil...but they have "no intention of doing so."

Well bless their hearts, we can believe them can't we?

Rand is making a great case. And, yes, I agree that Cruz and Rand make a great team for speaking out boldly.

[Pressing-On]

Explaining difference between Republic and Democracy!

[Pressing-On]

This is a totally brilliant speech!!! GO RAND!!!!