Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom
Facebook

Notices

The Newsroom FYI: News & Current Events, Political Discussions, etc.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2012, 07:40 AM
scotty's Avatar
scotty scotty is offline
Renewed


 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,432
Gun Control-Here we go again.

Mass shooting prompts calls from Capitol Hill and beyond for tighter gun laws


I am an active supporter of the right to bear arms. I both hunt and target shoot. Own handguns, rifles, and shotguns.

The Senator here is wanting to ban high capacity magazines. The first point I would like to make, as I'm sure RandyWayne can agree. High capacity clips had nothing to do with the Colorado shooting. Yes, it allowed him to fire off more rounds consecutively, but the time it takes one to drop a clip from an AR15, slap another one in, and chamber the first round is about 5 seconds. (for someone practiced, 10 seconds for a newbie) So the fact is, high capacity clips might have saved 1 in the overall scheme of the shooting. Or he could have stood there an extra 1 minute and still done the same damage.

Now, that being said, can any of you fellow gun owners think of any reasons at all why we would be against this ban? Personally, I see no need for high capacity clips. Other than having to stop and reload when target practicing, which I can live with. And for hunting, well, as grandpa always said, if it takes you more than one round you need to go back and shoot some more cans.

So honestly, if the ban covers JUST high capacity magazines, I wouldn't have a problem with it.

What say ye ?
__________________
You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree

In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter


www.scottysweb.com
www.chrisscottonline.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2012, 11:19 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

What about knives, blunt objects, etc............?
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-22-2012, 11:29 AM
scotty's Avatar
scotty scotty is offline
Renewed


 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,432
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy View Post
What about knives, blunt objects, etc............?
Well that falls back on the fact that people kill people, regardless of what weapon they use. In this case the weapon allowed him to kill more at one time.

I doubt they will go after gun control altogether. The article goes on to point out that everytime the Dems pass a gun control measure they lose seats in the following election.
__________________
You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree

In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter


www.scottysweb.com
www.chrisscottonline.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-22-2012, 12:53 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

How much magazine capacity it "too much!"? The arbitrary number given is usually 10 but why 10? My Ruger 9mm clips are 15, my AR is 30, and I have have a banana clip for my 22LR of 25. Why is the number 10 so magical?

And if it really ISN'T magical then why make the law and create even more precedent for further gun control under the guise of "We have to do something!"?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-22-2012, 12:55 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

And I still believe this whole shooting was a major hoax. After all, the shooter, Holmes, couldn't have had a gun in that particular theater -they weren't allowed in it! The "No Firearms!" sign on the front should have told him that!

I mean HAD he taken a gun into that theater he would have been breaking the "No Firearms!" allowed policy of the establishment and would have REALLY been breaking the law! At least all the law abiding carriers of concealed firearms had the good sense to not break that particular rule!

Last edited by RandyWayne; 07-22-2012 at 12:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-22-2012, 03:52 PM
BroJoe's Avatar
BroJoe BroJoe is offline
A Child Of The Most High


 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 320
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

I wonder what would have happened had 2 or 3 people been armed in that theatre...

I wonder what would have happened had a few people decided to fight back.

I wonder...

Instead...we will now decided whether or not to take what little teeth we have to bite, away from us...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-22-2012, 04:09 PM
scotty's Avatar
scotty scotty is offline
Renewed


 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,432
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroJoe View Post
I wonder what would have happened had 2 or 3 people been armed in that theatre...

I wonder what would have happened had a few people decided to fight back.

I wonder...

Instead...we will now decided whether or not to take what little teeth we have to bite, away from us...
Then 2 or 3 more people would have died.

Lets not forget the body armour he had on. If someone had returned fire it would have been useless, plus they would have been singled out by him and unless body armour was the dress code for the day, they would have died.

I see the point your making and I agree with the premise, but in this case returning fire would have done nothing more than made you a prime target.
__________________
You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree

In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter


www.scottysweb.com
www.chrisscottonline.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-22-2012, 04:48 PM
Jermyn Davidson's Avatar
Jermyn Davidson Jermyn Davidson is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In His Hands
Posts: 13,914
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

Limiting magazine capacity is almost a pointless gesture.

We don't need symbolism and we don't need a knee-jerk reaction to a senseless tragedy.

I am against this 100%

Now, in times past I have been in favor of limiting the types of guns and rifles that can be bought by civilians.

There's no need for a civilian to have a machine gun or rocket launcher.

I am unsure how I feel about civilians having the ability to purchase AR-15's. Just don't see the civilian purpose, but don't want to open the door any wider to restrict any more freedom either.
__________________
"The choices we make reveal the true nature of our character."

Last edited by Jermyn Davidson; 07-22-2012 at 04:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-22-2012, 05:24 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty View Post
Then 2 or 3 more people would have died.

Lets not forget the body armour he had on. If someone had returned fire it would have been useless, plus they would have been singled out by him and unless body armour was the dress code for the day, they would have died.

I see the point your making and I agree with the premise, but in this case returning fire would have done nothing more than made you a prime target.
Very likely 2 or 3 firing (and hitting him) WOULD have ended the rampage quickly. Body armor isn't a magical substance which bullets bounce off of leaving the wearer unharmed. While BA does save lives by keeping nearly all rounds from penetrating it still feels like your being punched when hit with a round. The bullet can even break bones through it! Yes, 2 or 3 firing at him would have ended it after getting disoriented but from the body blows and finally getting shot in the head/arms/legs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-22-2012, 05:28 PM
BroJoe's Avatar
BroJoe BroJoe is offline
A Child Of The Most High


 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 320
Re: Gun Control-Here we go again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
Very likely 2 or 3 firing (and hitting him) WOULD have ended the rampage quickly. Body armor isn't a magical substance which bullets bounce off of leaving the wearer unharmed. While BA does save lives by keeping nearly all rounds from penetrating it still feels like your being punched when hit with a round. The bullet can even break bones through it! Yes, 2 or 3 firing at him would have ended it after getting disoriented but from the body blows and finally getting shot in the head/arms/legs.
This too. The guy would have been shaken up. He obviously expected some type of engagement with law enforcement, otherwise he wouldn't have protected his body as such. But I wonder if he would have expected two or three people to be armed inside the actual theater.

I'm betting it would have tossed him off balance a bit.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Back door GUN CONTROL by Obama and Hilary with UN Esther Political Talk 37 07-23-2012 02:09 PM
Yes, I carry a Gun! Jacob's Ladder Fellowship Hall 50 08-15-2011 04:15 PM
The Skin Gun Digging4Truth Fellowship Hall 4 03-29-2011 10:41 AM
McCain vs. Obama on Gun Control Pressing-On Political Talk 6 10-14-2008 04:22 PM
Owning gun?? Truthseeker Fellowship Hall 102 04-25-2007 05:20 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.