Fired for speaking the truth

[coadie]

The move came after Mr. Williams, who is also a Fox News political analyst, appeared on the “The O’Reilly Factor” on Monday. On the show, the host, Bill O’Reilly, asked him to respond to the notion that the United States was facing a “Muslim dilemma.” Mr. O’Reilly said, “The cold truth is that in the world today jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet.”

Mr. Williams said he concurred with Mr. O’Reilly.

He continued: “I mean, look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...reilly-factor/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGUyL...layer_embedded

These are the endtimes.

2 Thes
11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

[Michael The Disciple]

Wow Juan is Liberal 101! When did this happen? Always did like him tho seemed like a nice guy. Consider this that if FOXNEWS which is supposed to be the MOST CONSERVATIVE voice in mainstream media would fire Juan for this what hope is their in warning of Islamic infiltration?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Wow Juan is Liberal 101! When did this happen? Always did like him tho seemed like a nice guy. Consider this that if FOXNEWS which is supposed to be the MOST CONSERVATIVE voice in mainstream media would fire Juan for this what hope is their in warning of Islamic infiltration?

Last night
I am sure the Gloria de Aldread will pounce on this for a wrongfull termination lawsuit.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Last night
I am sure the Gloria de Aldread will pounce on this for a wrongfull termination lawsuit.

How is it wrongful termination? NPR had the right to fire him if they felt he did not meet their editorial standards. In this case, they apparently felt that he did not.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

How is it wrongful termination? NPR had the right to fire him if they felt he did not meet their editorial standards. In this case, they apparently felt that he did not.

You don't know what you are talking about in several ways

1 He was not speaking on NPR Do you understand that?
2 He was not reading an editorial
3 Wackos like NPR have policies that are based on "feelings" (that is subjective as could be
4 Why would the left wing nazis have "feelings" about what was ok to say on Fox and what was not? It ain't their network
5 If the leftiests have rules about feelings, why are Juan's feelings rejected?
6 NPR doesn't set editorial standards on Fox.

This makes the leftist PC media look stupid.

Two faced liberals. Drinking the millions from Soros.

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

You don't know what you are talking about in several ways

1 He was not speaking on NPR Do you understand that?

I did not say he was speaking on NPR. He was speaking on Fox. However, NPR was the one who fired him, not Fox.

2 He was not reading an editorial

I did not say he was doing an editorial. However, the reason NPR fired him was because "the remarks 'were inconsistent with our editorial standards."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,2593969.story

There is horrible reading comprehension, and then there is coadie's.

3 Wackos like NPR have policies that are based on "feelings" (that is subjective as could be
4 Why would the left wing nazis have "feelings" about what was ok to say on Fox and what was not? It ain't their network
5 If the leftiests have rules about feelings, why are Juan's feelings rejected?
6 NPR doesn't set editorial standards on Fox.

This makes the leftist PC media look stupid.

Two faced liberals. Drinking the millions from Soros.

More coadieisms.

[sandie]

Originally Posted by coadie

You don't know what you are talking about in several ways

1 He was not speaking on NPR Do you understand that?
2 He was not reading an editorial
3 Wackos like NPR have policies that are based on "feelings" (that is subjective as could be
4 Why would the left wing nazis have "feelings" about what was ok to say on Fox and what was not? It ain't their network
5 If the leftiests have rules about feelings, why are Juan's feelings rejected?
6 NPR doesn't set editorial standards on Fox.

This makes the leftist PC media look stupid.

Two faced liberals. Drinking the millions from Soros.

Consider this edit a thumbsup for all your posts in this thread.

Soros is at work, he's buying up everything he can to subvert this country.
Sadly, the sheeple won't look enough into this to realize what is going on.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Twisp

How is it wrongful termination? NPR had the right to fire him if they felt he did not meet their editorial standards. In this case, they apparently felt that he did not.

What does statements made on another show have to do with editorial standards?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

What does statements made on another show have to do with editorial standards?

NPR must be in charge of Fox editorial standards.

[coadie]

So you admit he spoke and it wasn't "editorial content" played on the stations.