[mfblume]

Originally Posted by thephnxman

It's content and context . . . and not content alone!

I wrote: "WE surely will not condemn the world: but the unbelievers'
rejection of God's righteousness operating in the true Church will
condemn them(selves)."

Some people DO NOT truly believe in God. They believe (by their
own testimonies) that God erred in choosing Jesus as the ultimate
sacrifice, because Jesus erred in choosing the Ministry. How? By
insisting in the words of Jesus over the words of the apostles!
There is NOT AN IOTA OF CONTRADICTION or DIFFERENCE in the
Lord's and the apostles' doctrine.

If the apostles erred in content/context, then Jesus also erred; and
if the Lord Jesus erred, then the Father erred also. LISTEN UP: if
the Father erred, then He could NOT be God! It's that simple. I am
of the persuasion that the apostles followed ALL the Lord's doctrine
FULLY and WITHOUT EQUIVOCATION, because Jesus followed the
Father's mandate in the same manner: else Jesus could NOT be
"...the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world."

SHAZEEP: if you would follow the teaching of the Lord THROUGH the
Apostle Paul, you would do well. Now this:

"He who believes in Him is NOT condemned; but he that believes
not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the
NAME of the only begotten son of God."

What you're up against is the distorted reference to "law" in the Word, where it has been twisted to mean scripture. Law is not scripture. Law is efforts to attain salvation by works in the context where law is spoken negatively in the New Testament. Ironically, this is the same spirit that the world is currently wallowing in -- changing the definition of words like "marriage".