Apostolic Friends Forum - Hypothetical Banning Question

Page 1 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)

- Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)

- - Hypothetical Banning Question (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=25252)

Hoovie

07-25-2009 12:11 PM

Hypothetical Banning Question

It has come to our attention we are using far too much bandwidth and need to knock off a few of our least valuable posters.

This move is absolutely necessary so the rest of us can enjoy the freedom of continuing our discussions on magic hair, legalism and racist professors.

I do apologize in advance - sorry.

Now who shall we dump?

:foottap

Jermyn Davidson

07-25-2009 02:20 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 777843)

So would it be a hypothetical suicide if I banned myself into the abyss of an empty life without AFF?

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 02:28 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 777843)

Stephen, are you bored today? :smack

TJJJ	07-25-2009 02:45 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson (Post 777890)

So would it be a hypothetical suicide if I banned myself into the abyss of an empty life without AFF?

Hypothetically speaking?

:drama

Jermyn, let us know how we can help!

I have my cuzin you know, vinnie!:club

LOL - Jokin!

missourimary

07-25-2009 04:16 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

I'd volunteer... Hypothetically. So that the other hypothetical people who might be on the hypothetical dump list don't have to hypothetically be banned. :)

Praxeas

07-25-2009 04:25 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

I have an idea...one month it will be the Ultra cons...then we will unban them and ban the Ultra Libs...and so on and so on

TJJJ	07-25-2009 05:15 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 777934)

I have an idea...one month it will be the Ultra cons...then we will unban them and ban the Ultra Libs...and so on and so on

Prax,

You can start right now, they are getting pretty vicious over on the other thread!

hometown guy

07-25-2009 05:30 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJJJ (Post 777939)

Prax,

You can start right now, they are getting pretty vicious over on the other thread!

Yeah your right they are getting vicious but if he reversed it we can get them off faster ;)

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 05:33 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 777934)

I have an idea...one month it will be the Ultra cons...then we will unban them and ban the Ultra Libs...and so on and so on

Now your just taking the fun out of it.

The Only Way

07-25-2009 05:54 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman (Post 777944)

Now your just taking the fun out of it.

Lol, I'd have to agree! What's a debate without two sides?!

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 05:59 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Only Way (Post 777955)

Lol, I'd have to agree! What's a debate without two sides?!

I have to preach in the morning, and I need a topic. LOL!

The Only Way

07-25-2009 06:02 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman (Post 777959)

I have to preach in the morning, and I need a topic. LOL!

HA HA! hold on, did you just say that outloud!? :ursofunny

Hoovie

07-25-2009 08:07 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

OK Here is my final answer.

1. We can dump the libs and the cons alternately as Prax suggested.

2. We can simply dump [you] - they don't contribute a hill of beans anyway, and just breathe good AFF air.

Either way, I am safe.

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 08:28 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 778028)

OK Here is my final answer.

1. We can dump then libs and the cons alternately as Prax suggested.

2. We can simply dump [you] - they don't contribute a hill of beans anyway, and just breathe good AFF air.

Either way, I am safe.

Why would you want to "dump" [you]??? I know they are quite divisive, but dump them? That seems harsh.

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 08:32 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Stearns (Post 778048)

Why would you want to "dump" [you]??? I know they are quite divisive, but dump them? That seems harsh.

BUMP!!! :foottap

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 08:33 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Stearns (Post 778048)

Why would you want to "dump" [you]??? I know they are quite divisive, but dump them? That seems harsh.

Because [you], as mentioned by our illustrious friend has taking up precious AFF air (or bandwidth). *wink*

Irreligious

07-25-2009 08:35 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Stearns (Post 778048)

Why would you want to "dump" [you]???

Thanks Phil. In my ten days here I've survived mocking, condemnation, being pronounced "lost" 14 times, and a myriad of other things. The natives have been quite worked up!

Irreligious

07-25-2009 08:37 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 778028)

Thanks Stephen. I feel loved. Maybe you could start a thread and solicit a vote to see if I should be thrown off. And maybe, if the majority wants me gone, I could leave. Would you agree to that?

(I came back on to edit this. On second thought, I'll just let it stand so I can laugh at myself.)

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 08:37 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irreligious (Post 778054)

Thanks Phil. In my ten days here I've survived mocking, condemnation, being pronounced "lost" 14 times, and a myriad of other things. The natives have been quite worked up!

You're welcome I. Beware, it's a lion's den around here. :spit We definitely should not "dump" [you]. JMO

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 08:39 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irreligious (Post 778054)

Thanks Phil. In my ten days here I've survived mocking, condemnation, being pronounced "lost" 14 times, and a myriad of other things. The natives have been quite worked up!

You know what? I like [you].

mizpeh

07-25-2009 08:40 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Don't tell him!!!!! Please ....let him suffer as a martyr a little bit longer!!!

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 08:42 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman (Post 778063)

You know what? I like [you].

[you] is not a bad person at all, just a little cranky sometimes. ROFL.

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 08:44 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Stearns (Post 778067)

[you] is not a bad person at all, just a little cranky sometimes. ROFL.

I'm not so sure about that, after being gone for awhile, I heard about [you] and thought I'd come by to see what all the ruckus has been about.

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 08:47 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman (Post 778069)

I'm not so sure about that, after being gone for awhile, I heard about [you] and thought I'd come by to see what all the ruckus has been about.

[you] is not a pot stirrer like you Bro. Westman! :bigbaby

Sherri

07-25-2009 08:49 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Oh boy, everytime I see one of these threads, I get paranoid. :bigbaby Someone please let poor Irreligious in on the secret.

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 08:50 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Stearns (Post 778076)

[you] is not a pot stirrer like you Bro. Westman! :bigbaby

Why Phil, I'm hurt! I would never stir the pot, especially at the expense of [you]! Cut me some slack, will ya?

BrotherEastman

07-25-2009 08:51 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherri (Post 778077)

Oh boy, everytime I see one of these threads, I get paranoid. :bigbaby Someone please let poor Irreligious in on the secret.

Why?

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 08:52 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherri (Post 778077)

Oh boy, everytime I see one of these threads, I get paranoid. :bigbaby Someone please let poor [you] in on the secret.

[you] is a full grown adult and must learn what goes on on this forum.;-)

Cindy

07-25-2009 09:09 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

:girlnails

Hoovie

07-25-2009 09:13 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

To suffer is Christian.

This road is not easy. What if I was put here to inflict a little torture? The trial of your faith worketh patience, [you].

mizpeh

07-25-2009 09:20 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 778095)

To suffer is Christian.

This road is not easy. What if I was put here to inflict a little torture? The trial of your faith worketh patience, [you].

You speak truth, kimosabe.

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 09:21 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover (Post 778095)

To suffer is Christian.

This road is not easy. What if I was put here to inflict a little torture? The trial of your faith worketh patience, [you].

Stephen, I know you are an instrument of some kind (i.e. a "tool"), I just hope we haven't been too hard on [you]. God help [you], and God bless us everyone.

*AQuietPlace*

07-25-2009 09:22 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

:smack

:foottap

TJJJ	07-25-2009 09:24 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

I was thinking, when this first started, that this would be a fun thread to use the YOU function on!

IT HAS!!!!!

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 09:24 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh (Post 778098)

You speak truth, kimosabe.

LOL! U R funny. [you] is funny too. (sometimes)

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 09:26 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJJJ (Post 778101)

I was thinking, when this first started, that this would be a fun thread to use. .

IT HAS!!!!!

You think this is funny? [you] isn't laughing. :foottap

Jaxon

07-25-2009 09:29 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Somebody once said the reason they didn't wrestle with a pig is because when they got through it was still a pig and they were muddy.

TJJJ	07-25-2009 09:34 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Stearns (Post 778105)

You think this is funny? [you] isn't laughing. :foottap

Oh yes he is!

the first time they used the YOU I was trying to figure out who hated me!

It is a great feature!

Jaxon

07-25-2009 09:35 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

As long as there are at least a few dissenters out there I won't feel too bad.

Phil Stearns

07-25-2009 09:40 PM

Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJJJ (Post 778113)

Oh yes he is!

the first time I was trying to figure out who hated me!

It is a great feature!

Did you find out who hated you??? I see you survived the "hate". As Bro. Stephen says, "Let patience have her perfect work" (or something like that).
[you], hang in there, you'll understand it by and by.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Page 1 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page