Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2010, 01:18 PM
allstate1 allstate1 is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 810
my rant

First of all let me say I know most of these issues have been discussed so just let me vent! The longer I live the more questions I have about a few things. Matthew 28:19 vs Acts 2:38 I lean more toward the three step because of the chronological order. However the Jesus name vs the titles and the oneness vs the trinity view points I can see both sides! I just dont believe God is gonna send anyone to hell for not knowing something that is impossible to know until we see (get to heaven)!! Then there is the "standards". Most of Christianity agrees on the Ten Commandment type sins but the more popular denominations Baptist,Lutheran,Methodist etc have a very different viewpoints on "standards" compared to Pentecostal/Holiness! Almost every sermon I have heard in my 38 years about sin has been about the UPC standards (dress, hair, TV etc..)!! It seems that its easier to get saved than to stay saved. When Peter was asked what must we do to be saved he didnt follow Acts 2:38 with "and now do everything Paul says!!!!! Why if the UPC is the self acclaimed church of the book of Acts why are they so consumed and obsessed with Pauls letters to the different churches?? How can you have a standard and ignore cultural and historical time frame differences?? Why is the Pentecostal/Holiness type (UPC WPF ALJC etc ) so obsessed with outward appearance?? I will never believe outward apearance (the uniform) is a sign of inward holiness!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2010, 01:28 PM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Re: my rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by allstate1 View Post
First of all let me say I know most of these issues have been discussed so just let me vent! The longer I live the more questions I have about a few things. Matthew 28:19 vs Acts 2:38 I lean more toward the three step because of the chronological order. However the Jesus name vs the titles and the oneness vs the trinity view points I can see both sides! I just dont believe God is gonna send anyone to hell for not knowing something that is impossible to know until we see (get to heaven)!! Then there is the "standards". Most of Christianity agrees on the Ten Commandment type sins but the more popular denominations Baptist,Lutheran,Methodist etc have a very different viewpoints on "standards" compared to Pentecostal/Holiness! Almost every sermon I have heard in my 38 years about sin has been about the UPC standards (dress, hair, TV etc..)!! It seems that its easier to get saved than to stay saved. When Peter was asked what must we do to be saved he didnt follow Acts 2:38 with "and now do everything Paul says!!!!! Why if the UPC is the self acclaimed church of the book of Acts why are they so consumed and obsessed with Pauls letters to the different churches?? How can you have a standard and ignore cultural and historical time frame differences?? Why is the Pentecostal/Holiness type (UPC WPF ALJC etc ) so obsessed with outward appearance?? I will never believe outward apearance (the uniform) is a sign of inward holiness!!!
From what I've seen, the UPC isn't "consumed and obsessed with Pauls letters to the different churches." They just pick out a few proof texts and go from there. The vast majority of Paul's writings concern the relationship of Grace in salvation. Most UPCers will tend to ignore this.

Over all, however, I agree with your "rant." It is "easier" to get "saved" in a UPC style church than it is to "stay saved." That's why we cycle through so many people. The whole org seems designed to chew up human beings and spit them out. There's really very little about actually living in grace.

If you don't like the "standards," no problem. Get Out! We'll find another poor sucker to fill your pew.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2010, 01:45 PM
TGBTG TGBTG is offline
Jesus is the only Lord God


 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,565
Re: my rant

1 Cor 1:2 For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.
How about they just preach Christ and Him crucified?

As per staying saved:
Jude 1
(24) Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, (25) To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.

Jesus keeps us from falling. If we walk with Jesus, we ain't got nothing to be worried about. As for me, I know whom I have believed that He is able to keep me. The same Jesus who saved (not based on my merits) will keep me to the end (not based on merits). I am a firm believer of the Jesus being God (not in trinity terms) and Jesus name baptism. However, I fellowship with trinitarians because I'm at liberty as long as I don't use my liberty as an occasion to the flesh.

"Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage." One has to wonder, why are we commanded to stand fast in our liberty? Because if you don't, MEN WILL TRY TO TAKE YOUR LIBERTY FROM YOU as they tried in Galatians. Ok..i'm done
__________________
...Testifying both to the Jews, and also to the Greeks, repentance toward God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ...(Acts 20:21)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2010, 02:38 PM
A.W. Bowman's Avatar
A.W. Bowman A.W. Bowman is offline
A Student of the Word


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,132
Re: my rant

While it is has yet to catch on through out the entire body of Christ, there are many folks who are no longer content to sit back and listen every week the same old song and dance from the platforms.Teaching of the word of God (feed my flock) has, for a very long time, become a reoccurring theme of religious propaganda (we are right, everyone else is wrong).

Some folks are actually starting to study the Bible for themselves - and what they are getting out of their studies is sometimes markedly different than the church dogma that is dished out every week, regardless of the organizational source. What is being demanded is that spiritual leaders start doing their assigned jobs of teaching and leading, not condemning and commanding.

The truth? Many of those in church leadership are there because they were called and ordained by men, not God. Their study of the word gets filtered through church dogma and man-made doctrines, so that the original word has become of no affect. Men and women are starting to use the resources for study that the internet provides to reexamine long held beliefs, to see if they are actually valid or not. What they are finding is that many doctrines were created by men who did not really know nor understand scripture, but interpreted it according to their own understanding and religious philosophies (1Tim 1:7). It is called 'indoctrination'. Personally I do like 'indoctrination', I long for fellowship (relationship) and sound teaching on how to improve that relationship with both God and man.

As a movement, we have never, well, almost never, moved beyond the doctrines a baptisms, the laying on of hands, etc (Heb 6:1-2). It is always the same old same old. The question remains unaddressed: Why? For the same old reason that has been used since the beginning of time: If you don't want people to think for themselves, keep repeating the same message to them over and over again. Tell them if they do not think your way and submit to your authority, they are evil and can not continue in your fellowship. Conform or be dammed. These are strong arguments and have worked for centuries.

People are starting, as the men of Berea, to ask hard questions. Questions are a danger to any establishment, religious or secular. So, another political movement is created and a new religious organization is started.

Communities such as this one allows those with questions, to ask - and to pole its members as to "what do you think, and why?" And, our religious leaders are having a hard time responding in a meaningful way. "Because I said so." is just not working any more.
__________________
It makes no difference whether you study in the holy language, or in Arabic, or Aramaic [or in Greek or even in English]; it matters only whether it is done with understanding. - Moshe Maimonides.

Last edited by A.W. Bowman; 09-10-2010 at 04:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2010, 02:44 PM
A.W. Bowman's Avatar
A.W. Bowman A.W. Bowman is offline
A Student of the Word


 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,132
Re: my rant

For those trying to read my last post, while I was making all of my 'real-time' changes/corrections, I apologize. I almost always have to go back and do a bit of editorial work after I post something. Sigh!
__________________
It makes no difference whether you study in the holy language, or in Arabic, or Aramaic [or in Greek or even in English]; it matters only whether it is done with understanding. - Moshe Maimonides.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2010, 02:58 PM
allstate1 allstate1 is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 810
Re: my rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by HaShaliach View Post
For those trying to read my last post, while I was making all of my 'real-time' changes/corrections, I apologize. I almost always have to go back and do a bit of editorial work after I post something. Sigh!
The because I said so thing has gotten old!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2010, 03:09 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: my rant

... old wine skins...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-10-2010, 03:13 PM
allstate1 allstate1 is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 810
Re: my rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
... old wine skins...
??? as compared to ....old potatoe skins??
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-10-2010, 05:40 PM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Re: my rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by allstate1 View Post
The because I said so thing has gotten old!!
Just because YOU say so?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-10-2010, 06:34 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: my rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by allstate1 View Post
??? as compared to ....old potatoe skins??
pig skins
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1Corinth2v4's Rant & Rave Thread 1Corinth2v4 Fellowship Hall 20 08-02-2009 06:39 PM
Dave Ramsey's Latest Rant DanielR Fellowship Hall 19 07-07-2008 12:24 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.