Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #911  
Old 12-30-2010, 07:52 PM
sandie sandie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
Sorry Sandie you were saying
I was and am saying that Jason has spoke the truth in love. I've read every single page on this thread. He hasn't pointed a bony finger of condemnation at anyone.
You'd do well to take a lesson from him and page out of his book.
Reply With Quote
  #912  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:25 PM
Jason B Jason B is offline
Saved by Grace


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
I had the same question Azzan ... I'd just like to know the process from the beginning and then the next step ...

Hypothetical ...Jason actually has a gay friend ...
I addressed this already to Azzan. I may have a close friend who is, or at least certainly was. I also have close friends who are both fornicators and adulters, though not currently in an adulterous relationship.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
How does he even broach the subject? ...
God opens doors, I don't think I have ever pre-detrmined to go and tell someone they needed to get right. The doors have always opened so that I could say what was needed to say in the context of love, while still being blunt about their sin and need for repentance. And as I said, I have not lost any of theri friendships ove the years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
How does he explain his position?
I explain that there are certaiin lifestyles and sins that if one continously adheres to will keep them from entering the Kingdom of God, and normally will mention 1 Corinthians 6. I also mention that I've been involved in many sins listed in that passage, and point out the "some WERE such as you" and talk about redemption. I do this NEVER in a self rightous or condemning manner, but more as a warning and appeal in love.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
How does he suggest to remedy his sin problem?
By asking God's help. Many times they feel like they cannot break the chain, and sometimes they flat don't want to. When I spoke to my friend about his adultery, he told me "adultery is not ALWAYS wrong, it is okay in some situations-he don't treat her right, and I do."

Sometimes the response is a very outright rejection, and sometimes a consideration of the things I am telling them. But the remedy is the only remedy that can be given, just surrender to God in repetnace.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
How does he handle objections?
Depends on the rejection. They can and have ranged from questions, which we discussed, to post modern relativism, to outright self justification. In any case like I said, friendships have remained intact, and all know where I stand, so I guess whatever the situation, I can say I don't have blood on my hands I have given the warning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
If he doesn't accept "the message" ... what does he do?
Rarely do they accept the message as far as an outright repenting, being baptized, etc. I don't handle it any differently than the heterosexual sinners I witness to who don't accept it. I just keep sowing the seed, I leave it to God to give the increase, and I always attempt to speak the truth in love. I NEVER give an ultimatum-If you don't repent we can no longer be friends. I never seek to break the relationship, and the only way I would ever do so, is if they suggested that they could be a Christian and remain in a sin such as homosexuality, adultery, fornication. So long as they are aware of their need for God, even if they don't seem to be responding to that need, it is my responsibility to be an ambassador of Christ to them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
How does he handle discipleship if he does?
The same way I handle any conversion, suggest a personal Bible study on the basics of the faith, and encourage faithful church attendance. I can't change the heart, I don't try to. I believe when someone truly repents God changes their heart, and changes their desires. Not to say they may not battle, expecially as a new convert, but God will help them. Though I really believe that God can and does completely take the desire out of their heart. I have another very close friend who was hooked on meth and done some very deplorable things, who completely surrendered to God in his jail cell and God completely 100% changed him. I was present with this gentelman after he got out of county in his first interview, with tattoos on his arms, and face, and a record that is beyond is years, he was asked "why should I hire you, how do you know you've overcome you addiction? He said "Because I'm a new creation in Christ, Jesus has taken all the desires for that stuff away from me, it doesn't even appeal to me." That's what Christ can do, thats the gospel. Not a band aid on a sinner, and a self help positive thinking emergent/relevant goobly gook. But a true life. It is the POWER of God unto salvation. And that man who glorified Christ in his interview was hired, and within less than three months has already been pomoted and received a pay increase, and not to mention is on fire for God and testifies to everyone he gets a chance of the grace of God.
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards

"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship

"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
Reply With Quote
  #913  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:47 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo View Post
Sorry Azzan, I missed the cotnext, which is AFTER I have already spoken to them of their sin, and they refused to repent.

I would continue to love them, this is in fact the situation I am in with my best friend, and another very close friend, who I suspect being homosexual, though they have not blantatly told me, We have had some discussions on that subject, and that person has heard me preach several times, and enjoys my preaching, though they confessed they cried all the way home one time under condemnation because they knew what I had preached was right. (That day I preached on "such were some of you-after being told that and some other things by this person I think they may be 'in the closet'). Nevertheless, these two people know my views very well. I honestly believe they know their sin (one fornication, one possibly homosexuality), but don't want to leave it.

I have told them both, EVEN if you never get in church and serve God, I will still love you, and hope our friendship can continue. I would much rather that you lived for God, and you will find the true fulfillment you are seeking, but if you don't, I will be your friend no matter what.

As I said I am close to these people, and have regualr contact with them. The second one I mentioned brought Christmas gifts to me and my children last week.

The answer is, I would love them, and continue to seek oppertunities as God gives them.

Really got to go.....will be back.
Excellent post! Compassion and love for the lost!
Reply With Quote
  #914  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:25 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie View Post
I was and am saying that Jason has spoke the truth in love. I've read every single page on this thread. He hasn't pointed a bony finger of condemnation at anyone.
You'd do well to take a lesson from him and page out of his book.
oh Sandie, Sandie, Sandie

I am so sorry it appears that way.

No doubt it is because I usually do such short posts.

I love the sinner and hate the sin.

Many times I weep when I look on FB and see what were once men of God.

Their wives no longer content with trimming hair, wearing bifurcated garments, and Jezebel masks.

They are actually standing by their husbands in bikinis while the men have nothing but shorts and tank tops.

Oh Sandie, when I find a young man who still has the fortitude to call an abomination just that I applaud .

Jason and I both simply say that a gay wedding is an abomination.

That a true man of God would not destroy his ministry and witness by supporting it.

Maybe he won’t go to hell for attending but he is not shunning the appearance of evil.

Oh Sandie, we love the sinner not the sin.
Reply With Quote
  #915  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:30 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith View Post
El Predicador, your statements here are very difficult to respond to. My first
reaction would be similar to NotofWorks...to laugh my head off. But then I realize how serious you are
about this and any attempts to give a serious response are very challenging. But I'll make this deal with you...I'll try
my best not to grab a sign at a gay rights parade because I've observed that someone is tired.

I know you don't mean to be entertaining, but you are!! And just for you, I've decided to center my post in red
.
They say imitation is the most sincere flattery in this case...

Centered and red is usually the mark of an ultracon

You seem more like a green and left justified sort of guy.

I am glad you choose not to grab the weary gay man's sign.

But I am also glad you finally see the point.

Shun the appearance of evil.

Why go to the wedding when you can mail a card?
Reply With Quote
  #916  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:52 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

thilly thread!
Reply With Quote
  #917  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:54 PM
sandie sandie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
oh Sandie, Sandie, Sandie

I am so sorry it appears that way.

No doubt it is because I usually do such short posts.

I love the sinner and hate the sin.

Many times I weep when I look on FB and see what were once men of God.

Their wives no longer content with trimming hair, wearing bifurcated garments, and Jezebel masks.

They are actually standing by their husbands in bikinis while the men have nothing but shorts and tank tops.

Oh Sandie, when I find a young man who still has the fortitude to call an abomination just that I applaud .

Jason and I both simply say that a gay wedding is an abomination.

That a true man of God would not destroy his ministry and witness by supporting it.

Maybe he won’t go to hell for attending but he is not shunning the appearance of evil.

Oh Sandie, we love the sinner not the sin.
The difference is, Jason speaks it like Jesus....you on the other hand have that bony critical, legalistic finger of condemnation pointing at others. Try and remember you have three pointing back.
You just couldn't pass up a chance to condemn others, could you? Hence the remarks about people on FB, as if that matters to the discussion at hand or as if I care.

I just get the "creeps" having you type my name that many times. Try and refrain from that in the future...thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #918  
Old 12-30-2010, 09:59 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie View Post
The difference is, Jason speaks it like Jesus....you on the other hand have that bony critical, legalistic finger of condemnation pointing at others. Try and remember you have three pointing back.
You just couldn't pass up a chance to condemn others, could you? Hence the remarks about people on FB, as if that matters to the discussion at hand or as if I care.

I just get the "creeps" having you type my name that many times. Try and refrain from that in the future...thanks.
So you support that conduct on FB?
Reply With Quote
  #919  
Old 12-30-2010, 10:01 PM
sandie sandie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
So you support that conduct on FB?
What is your problem?
I don't even go on FB.
Reply With Quote
  #920  
Old 12-30-2010, 10:05 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie View Post
What is your problem?
I don't even go on FB.
It was merely a question.

You came after me from the beginning.

I tell you I weep for souls.

And still you attack?

Don't think I am the one with the problem.

Be blessed
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DADT will still be enforced. coadie Political Talk 21 11-18-2010 05:38 PM
California AG urges court to repeal prop 8 Praxeas The Newsroom 4 12-20-2008 07:42 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Praxeas

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.