Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #891  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:11 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace* View Post
Give me a chance, I have to sleep occasionally.

I wouldn't attend the shower (the celebration of a gay couple adopting) for the same reason I wouldn't attend the wedding, but I'd very likely send a gift to the child, because the child isn't the problem.

To answer DA, yes I would attend a shower for a child of an unwed mother, because the baby isn't the problem. I believe that every child should be celebrated. A baby is something good that can come out of a bad situation.

If the mother threw a party upon finding out she was pregnant - "Hey, everybody, I'm pregnant, come celebrate with me!" - I wouldn't attend that event. But the birth of the child - the birth itself should be celebrated. Every new life is worthy of celebration.

I may not respond to any responses for a while, have a busy weekend ahead.

A shower is a celebration?? Really??

Ok, so we'll go with your "Celebration" label. So am I hearing you say that anything that you would consider to be a celebration, you wouldn't attend, but if it's not a celebration and sin just extemporaneously breaks out, you would attend and stay? What's the difference? If sin is there, doesn't your continued presence endorse the sin?

But it looks like to me you completely contradicted yourself when you said that you WOULD attend the baby shower of an unwed mother because the baby isn't the problem. BUT WAIT.....does that mean the baby IS the problem at a gay couple's baby shower? Can you clarify that?

Your rules for celebratory codes is confusing to me.
Reply With Quote
  #892  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:12 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truthseeker View Post
I'm not AQP, please tell me you wouldn't go to a baby shower for homosexuals?? Please!

As AQP said, it's all about the baby. No wait, that was the baby of an unwed mother. If it's a baby of a gay couple, then it isn't about the baby. Right? I got lost in there, somewhere.

In conclusion.....yep, I would go. And I would buy a really nice gift.
Reply With Quote
  #893  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:13 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
Dude you are funny too.

I join in his sin by reading it? I have no idea if it is about you it could be about any number of bottom feeders. I have seen it and found it so funny I forwarded the link to my pastor.

What part of the post was untrue?




Is there a screw loose?
Reply With Quote
  #894  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:14 PM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
What else can one expect from your generation.

Glad there are still some young men around like Jason.

Not afraid to call out sinners and tell them to their face.

A modern John the Baptist. Need more like that.


Jason, this should worry you. Before long, EB is gonna show up and brag on you.
Reply With Quote
  #895  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:22 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith View Post
Jason, this should worry you. Before long, EB is gonna show up and brag on you.
Elder Benincasa is another good man, not afraid to call out sin.

Why would that bother you "Mr Smith"?

You seem like a nice enough young man.

But your actions?

"Avoid the very appearance of evil" thus saith the Bible.

Suppose you go witness in gay bars too?

Sure would be a great cover for sin.

No sister I didn't do anything wrong in the motel with someone else's wife

I was witnessing.

No I was not supporting the gay parade, someone looked tired so I held his sign for awhile.

Avoid the very appearance of evil Mr Smith, the very appearance.
Reply With Quote
  #896  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:27 PM
notofworks's Avatar
notofworks notofworks is offline
Ravaged by Grace


 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,948
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
Elder Benincasa is another good man, not afraid to call out sin.

Why would that bother you "Mr Smith"?

You seem like a nice enough young man.

But your actions?

"Avoid the very appearance of evil" thus saith the Bible.

Suppose you go witness in gay bars too?

Sure would be a great cover for sin.

No sister I didn't do anything wrong in the motel with someone else's wife

I was witnessing.

No I was not supporting the gay parade, someone looked tired so I held his sign for awhile.

Avoid the very appearance of evil Mr Smith, the very appearance.


I know you're serious, but please don't hate me if this is the hardest I laughed in a while!!!! "Someone looked tired so I held his sign...". I have tears!!!

Ok, now with a straight face....You seem to be stretching the "Appearance" thing beyond recognition. That's the trouble with you con-ners....you take a verse and burn it beyond all recognition.
__________________
You know you miss me
Reply With Quote
  #897  
Old 12-30-2010, 02:36 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

browsing the tellervision... there's a gay m2m wedding on the Jerry Springer Show.
Reply With Quote
  #898  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:14 PM
onefaith2 onefaith2 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 4,343
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

here's a quick fix.. put in stalls.... i'm not comfortable showering in the open with any man, gay or not lol
__________________
To be able to unite in difference carries more weight than all the opinions the universe can hold
Reply With Quote
  #899  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:45 PM
Truthseeker's Avatar
Truthseeker Truthseeker is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,888
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith View Post
In conclusion.....yep, I would go. And I would buy a really nice gift.
You got issues.
__________________
Today pull up the little weeds,
The sinful thoughts subdue,
Or they will take the reins themselves
And someday master you. --Anon.


The most deadly sins do not leap upon us, they creep up on us.
Reply With Quote
  #900  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:55 PM
sandie sandie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo View Post
Thanks Hoovie, and the several others who have complemented my viewpoints. I do certainly love the unbeliever, very much so, for I was in their situation when Christ died for me. YEARS I spent in vanity and pride, caring not my Lord was crucified. I didn't care about God, or other people.
I was a wicked sinner, and worthy of the damnation of hell. And s I never judge anything before the time, BUT the Bible plainly tells us what sins will keep us out of the Kingdom of God, tells us to reprove them, and as ministers to make a clear distinction between the holy and unholy.

ANYONE claiming I don't love people because I wouldn't attend a homosexual marriage, and STRONGLY disapprove of any christian doing so is way out of bounds, and they don't know me. I'm not going to publish my good works (which are not meritous BTW) n here. Suffice it to say, God knows my heart, and there isn't a homosexual, a rapist, a pedophile, or a murderer I don't love, and yes I do regularly minister to these people, and do so with love. I willlet my works stand before God, and more importantly he knows my heart, and the motivation in which I do thing, and HE KNOWS whether I love in truth or pretense, regardless of what some AFF posters may think.
I've had no problem seeing your love for all concerned in this thread.
I hope no one is questioning that.
I've read and re-read, thought and re-thought and I just can't get away from believing you have explained the biblical and Godly concepts behind this topic in a well thought out manner and I must agree.

If there's something else lacking in my understanding I hope and pray earnestly that the Lord will reveal what else I need to know and therefore practice.

I appreciate your contributions to this thread and I also appreciate everyone else's.
We can all agree on the fact that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God, but we can differ on the approaches and still be in right standing.

I've had to really question some things....like what would I do if a family member were homosexual and invited me to their wedding (I wouldn't even consider it for someone other than family).
To be consistent, I could not attend.
What got me to that place was the idea of attending someone's abortion (even a family member).
There is no way on God's greenest earth could I even offer a ride to the clinic, never mind stay there.
It was that scenario that made me have to face the question of attending a homosexual wedding.
And with all that having been said and decided, there's no way on God's greenest earth could I not continue to love either family member...the one marrying someone of their own gender or someone who had an abortion.
And I will extend that to non-family members as well. How dare I do otherwise.

I pray we can all find the center of God's perfect will.

Blessings.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DADT will still be enforced. coadie Political Talk 21 11-18-2010 05:38 PM
California AG urges court to repeal prop 8 Praxeas The Newsroom 4 12-20-2008 07:42 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Praxeas
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.