***Election Day 2012: The Day Of Decision*** - Page 9

Pressing-On · #81 11-07-2012, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CC1

I stand by what I said about Newt not having broad appeal and as I stated during the primaries I will NEVER support a candidate for President with his marriage history, no matter how brilliant they are or how much I like them.

I hold the office of President in too high regard for someone who is a serial adulterer to hold it.

Really, and you wanted to support a serial flip-flopper? Maybe that's that lesser of two evils you got going on.

Nitehawk013 · #82 11-07-2012, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Why don't you look at the reality of what really happened and stop lying to yourself. He was a notorious flip-flopper and no one was certain of his plans. When it comes time to vote, Americans do not like uncertainty in a candidate.

And as much as we don't like Obama, at least he says what he is going to do.

I will say this again, since apparently YOU cannot read or answer a question. Was the GOP turnout down from 08? I dont know, so I asked. Now if it WASN'T that means just as many turned out for Romney as they did McCain and your idea of them all running from Romney is just more of your typical nonsense. If turnout was UP from 08, that makes you even more wrong as usual.

If the problem was independants, as I suspect it was, then that means the moderate Romney was unable to sway supposedly moderate Independants. If that is true, there is no way that Newt and his divisive character would draw moderates to him. Further, it appears clear that "moderates" really just means "liberals" more and more meaning there is NO WAY Newt would actually draw them.

and if the loss was hinged on women voters, then again...Newt holds much the same stance as Romney when it comes to stopping abortion and PP. So again...you really think women would vote for Newt over Mitt when they hold the same positions...but Newt dumped a diseased wife on top of it? Are you kidding me?

Pressing-On · #83 11-07-2012, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitehawk013

I will say this again, since apparently YOU cannot read or answer a question. Was the GOP turnout down from 08? I dont know, so I asked. Now if it WASN'T that means just as many turned out for Romney as they did McCain and your idea of them all running from Romney is just more of your typical nonsense. If turnout was UP from 08, that makes you even more wrong as usual.

If the problem was independants, as I suspect it was, then that means the moderate Romney was unable to sway supposedly moderate Independants. If that is true, there is no way that Newt and his divisive character would draw moderates to him. Further, it appears clear that "moderates" really just means "liberals" more and more meaning there is NO WAY Newt would actually draw them.

and if the loss was hinged on women voters, then again...Newt holds much the same stance as Romney when it comes to stopping abortion and PP. So again...you really think women would vote for Newt over Mitt when they hold the same positions...but Newt dumped a diseased wife on top of it? Are you kidding me?

First of all, check your facts about Newt dumping a diseased wife. His daughters have refuted that claim. When you get that simple fact corrected, we can talk. And wrong as usual? Mitt didn't win, did he? Guess I"m not wrong about everything.

ILG · #84 11-07-2012, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

After all of Rush Limbaugh's fear mongering, I heard a clip of him saying, "We will survive four more years of Obama." I wanted to slap his face for putting so much fear into people's lives. Oh, well, I guess they could change the station. I haven't listened to Sean Hannity in over a year. So tired of the fear mongering.

We are always in the hands of a good and great God. We have nothing to fear, but fear itself.

I don't listen to those talk shows. I just keep up with the news. The Jews in Germany in the late 30s and early 40s were in "God's hands" too. Not saying we should compare our situation with theirs but just sayin'....

ILG · #85 11-07-2012, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The Republicans haven't been transparent either. You need to study some of the policies that the Republicans have put in place that are causing us to lose our freedoms. Both parties are destroying our country.

And I don't present BO as trustworthy, but he promised healthcare reform, DADT, equal pay for women. Whether we like him or not, these were some of the things he promised his supporters he would accomplish.

Romney stepped into the healthcare issue contradicting himself that the mandate in MA was a fee. Later He flip-flops, in an interview, and called it a tax. So, the reality is that we didn't have a candidate to challenge Obama that made the people trust or feel comfortable.

There isn't any point in crying over spilled milk, it's done.

Yes, both parties are destroying our country. I just think the Republicans destroy it more slowly......

Pressing-On · #86 11-07-2012, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILG

Yes, both parties are destroying our country. I just think the Republicans destroy it more slowly......

LOL! Right, so if we get on the slow train, we die a little later.

Pressing-On · #87 11-07-2012, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILG

I don't listen to those talk shows. I just keep up with the news. The Jews in Germany in the late 30s and early 40s were in "God's hands" too. Not saying we should compare our situation with theirs but just sayin'....

They voted for the lesser of two evils and got Hitler.

ILG · #88 11-07-2012, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

LOL! Right, so if we get on the slow train, we die a little later.

Or there is more time for an intervention....

Pressing-On · #89 11-07-2012, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILG

Or there is more time for an intervention....

After how this whole primary and Convention deal went down. Not having hopes of an intervention coming from the Republican Party.

The RNC are fools for backing a liberal, progressive, vulture capitalist and the conservatives and Christians are fools for supporting him. We got exactly what we deserved. Call it Karma, God's will, or whatever. You get what you pay for and now the party has zero credibility because the "so called" conservatives and tea party people, enthusiastically supported this criminal. Good move. JMO.

ILG · #90 11-07-2012, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

After how this whole primary and Convention deal went down. Not having hopes of an intervention coming from the Republican Party.

The RNC are fools for backing a liberal, progressive, vulture capitalist and the conservatives and Christians are fools for supporting him. We got exactly what we deserved. Call it Karma, God's will, or whatever. You get what you pay for and now the party has zero credibility because the "so called" conservatives and tea party people, enthusiastically supported this criminal. Good move. JMO.

Well, I didn't vote for either one of them. But I would have rather had Romney than Obama. At least Romney is not an open baby killer.