Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 07-15-2009, 01:43 PM
OnTheFritz's Avatar
OnTheFritz OnTheFritz is offline
Tired of it.


 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,645
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary View Post
Thanks.



Jesus did... Luke 11:4, Eph 4:32

...though you just inadvertently led me to an answer to a personal question that bugged me a long time~Thanks!
Glad to help
__________________
Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. — André Gide

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds... - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 07-15-2009, 02:15 PM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Yeah but thanks to this good brother they get to share pictures of certain body parts that were exposed. Things that they missed by not being there.
hubba-hubba?

Really though, this would demonstrate such a low level of class that I can't imagine anyone doing this would have any real influence among godly preachers. Sounds more like a junior high school stunt gone awry.

What hurts is that I fellowshipped with and even tried to be a part of something with many of these guys. It just makes a whole period of my own life look so empty and worthless when I see their antics without the blinders on my eyes. I was a fool.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 07-15-2009, 02:34 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Quote:
Originally Posted by HaShaliach View Post
No legal (criminal or civil) charges can be brought if the person photographed cannot be "clearly" identified (the showing the face, publicly known/identifiable scars, tattoos, etc.) or if the photographs do not include (or attempts to include) a person's "private parts" (generally that does not include a person's legs, arms, back or head), it is considered simply a photograph of "the public" or "people" in a public place or setting (such as on a public street, in general (public) business or building open to the public, etc.)

The photographs need to be downloaded and submitted to an attorney for evaluation.

As for the "minister": I agree with all of the above comments!
As to legality, well said and I concur.

James Griffin, Attorney at Law. :-)
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 07-15-2009, 02:52 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Man, I could have so much fun with this guy......
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 07-15-2009, 02:52 PM
rgcraig's Avatar
rgcraig rgcraig is offline
My Family!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Griffin View Post
As to legality, well said and I concur.

James Griffin, Attorney at Law. :-)
I thought that was correct too, but didn't have the degree to back it.

Renda Craig, Peanut Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 07-15-2009, 03:02 PM
El Predicador El Predicador is offline
Silent No More


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 473
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

I know the minister in question and like Stephanas decry the unwarranted scurrilous attacks , innuendo, and character assignation of this brother.

How is it a posted obscenity if it was what these women wore to campmeeting? This photos were not close-ups or zoom ins, and deliberately had no face shots. This was to keep it from being a personal issue and sticking to the issue at hand. Namely the infiltration of immodesty into our ranks. In the name of relevancy all standards of modesty are being destroyed and mocked. This entire thread merely proves that point.

Bobbed hair, slit skirts, what is next, let’s just wear miniskirts and go braless because the world does? If we cover our bodies they won’t like us and we can’t lead them to Jesus?

Also sick of this being a supposed gender bais. It is the women pushing the envelope at campmeeting. There was no discussion of the men showing up in shorts or sleeveless was there? The biggest crime is men no longer having authority in their own home and are letting these women run over them.

But, back to the issue. SH is a man of God, and a prophet, it is his obligation to point out sin when it runs rampant and no one else is speaking out. Where is the outrage against the district leaders who have allowed this at their district? Why are they trying to cover it up? And it IS relevant that this was done at a campmeeting instead of just going out to a fast food restaurant. When did it become the norm to dress down for church?
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 07-15-2009, 03:05 PM
KWSS1976's Avatar
KWSS1976 KWSS1976 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,982
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

El Predicador thsi man had a digital camera like the world "DOES"so he was just at much at fault as the women but I don't think they were at fault...
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 07-15-2009, 03:06 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Well, "I" for one am outraged!
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 07-15-2009, 03:12 PM
KWSS1976's Avatar
KWSS1976 KWSS1976 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,982
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

What ye say to the Digital Cmera EL PRED.......Is that not "Worldly"
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 07-15-2009, 03:13 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: (( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Predicador View Post
I know the minister in question and like Stephanas decry the unwarranted scurrilous attacks , innuendo, and character assignation of this brother.

How is it a posted obscenity if it was what these women wore to campmeeting? This photos were not close-ups or zoom ins, and deliberately had no face shots. This was to keep it from being a personal issue and sticking to the issue at hand. Namely the infiltration of immodesty into our ranks. In the name of relevancy all standards of modesty are being destroyed and mocked. This entire thread merely proves that point.

Bobbed hair, slit skirts, what is next, let’s just wear miniskirts and go braless because the world does? If we cover our bodies they won’t like us and we can’t lead them to Jesus?

Also sick of this being a supposed gender bais. It is the women pushing the envelope at campmeeting. There was no discussion of the men showing up in shorts or sleeveless was there? The biggest crime is men no longer having authority in their own home and are letting these women run over them.

But, back to the issue. SH is a man of God, and a prophet, it is his obligation to point out sin when it runs rampant and no one else is speaking out. Where is the outrage against the district leaders who have allowed this at their district? Why are they trying to cover it up? And it IS relevant that this was done at a campmeeting instead of just going out to a fast food restaurant. When did it become the norm to dress down for church?
One does not post pictures of what not to wear if the wearing being portrayed is considered immodest. It is defeating the purpose of standing against "slits" to post pictures of women in slits to show people what not to wear, or what is infiltrating the ranks. It is asking the people to look at women with what they consider to be immodest apparel, when the whole point of claiming that something is immodest is to notify people they should not look at such things, let alone wear them.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Walmart Prank - Somebody Needs Charges Filed Digging4Truth Fellowship Hall 15 04-23-2009 09:57 AM
UPCI charges 23% of missions giving areyourucky Fellowship Hall 25 03-21-2009 09:49 PM
Woman Charges The Pope tstew Fellowship Hall 12 02-27-2009 10:12 AM
Victoria cleared of all charges!!!!!!!!! ThePastorsCoach The Newsroom 54 08-14-2008 08:06 PM
Answer to charges that Names were used without consent stmatthew WPF News 56 02-06-2008 01:22 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.