Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 05-23-2009, 08:04 PM
ManOfWord's Avatar
ManOfWord ManOfWord is offline
Honorary Admin


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
With the exception of Atheists and the Carlton Pearson crowd, everyone's doctrine puts someone in hell

That's not the problem. The 3 step plan is unique in its logical conclusion. The problem is it puts godly people in hell whose lives have changed and who are living for the Lord.
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant
http://www.newlife-church.org
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 05-23-2009, 09:00 PM
LUKE2447 LUKE2447 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,730
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManOfWord View Post
That's not the problem. The 3 step plan is unique in its logical conclusion. The problem is it puts godly people in hell whose lives have changed and who are living for the Lord.

Alot of people of all races and faiths have really good people. So why would it be any different from someone who simply says I agree with this andstill be a good person? Being a good person and following a philosophy does not save you. Many people of all religions have had experience of change for a higher purpose and for the good of man and set aside many things. People who justify truth by numbers due to XYZ belief makes ABC good person not saved is unbelievable. Also please define living for the Lord. What by human wisdom? What justifies you "living for the Lord" to negate scripture.

All I need to know is you deny baptism is for remission of sins and when the atonement of Christ is realized. To me that shows me how far you have had to go in your logic. Few things will I say are hardcore doctrine and I will not make exceptions to and baptism is one of them. You really have to do a lot of negating of scripture and it ususally is due to other doctrines that influence this. All doctrine have a vien of reasoning and most that are against baptism in that way usually are follow the same course of false doctrine.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 05-23-2009, 09:12 PM
Light Light is offline
Solid 3 Stepper


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,802
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManOfWord View Post
That's not the problem. The 3 step plan is unique in its logical conclusion. The problem is it puts godly people in hell whose lives have changed and who are living for the Lord.

I know people who have change and if you looked at them you would say they are christians. They live a cleaner life than some christians I know. People can change without God. Oh BTW they don't believe there is a God.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 05-23-2009, 10:10 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

We are not talking about good moral people here who have no acquaintance with Jesus. We are talking about people who were sinners, people who became convicted and drawn by the Holy Spirit, and after hearing about His death on the cross, turned to the Lord in faith and repentance and asked Jesus Christ to come into their lives. When they did that, something happened. Their life was radically changed. We one-steppers would call that salvation or conversion or a born again experience. Three-steppers would call it a good start but not near enough to save them. Other three-steppers would call it deception or a work of satan because it was not followed by water baptism and the Holy Ghost Baptism. Some of those folks that I am speaking of even went on and received the Holy Ghost Baptism, but because they did not get baptized in water "properly" three steppers had to do something with them so they react in various ways. Some say they still aren't saved because they haven't completed the "three steps." Others say they are on their way to hell because their sins haven't been forgiven/remitted/washed away. Others say they did not receive the "real" Holy Ghost. Meanwhile these theoretical people continue on, loving the Lord, serving the Lord, exhibiting the fruit of the Spirit, operating in the gifts of the Spirit, etc. oblivious to the fact that they are on their way to hell because they haven't completed the three steps properly.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 05-24-2009, 01:30 AM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Very good Sam and Mow. I appreciate your posts here.

I cannot say my own experience differs from yours. While I know some wonderful OP Christian people, I know many who exemplify Christian living and show the love of Christ who are not Oneness Pentecostal at all. I count them as nothing less then brothers and sisters in the Lord.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 05-24-2009, 07:43 AM
ManOfWord's Avatar
ManOfWord ManOfWord is offline
Honorary Admin


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447 View Post
Alot of people of all races and faiths have really good people. So why would it be any different from someone who simply says I agree with this andstill be a good person? Being a good person and following a philosophy does not save you. Many people of all religions have had experience of change for a higher purpose and for the good of man and set aside many things. People who justify truth by numbers due to XYZ belief makes ABC good person not saved is unbelievable. Also please define living for the Lord. What by human wisdom? What justifies you "living for the Lord" to negate scripture.

All I need to know is you deny baptism is for remission of sins and when the atonement of Christ is realized. To me that shows me how far you have had to go in your logic. Few things will I say are hardcore doctrine and I will not make exceptions to and baptism is one of them. You really have to do a lot of negating of scripture and it ususally is due to other doctrines that influence this. All doctrine have a vien of reasoning and most that are against baptism in that way usually are follow the same course of false doctrine.
Listen very closely: I do NOT believe in "Easy Believism" which basically states that all you have to do is say a prayer and you're saved. I believe in genuine repentance. If one has not repented and surrendered their life to Jesus Christ, then I don't care how many times they were baptized, even in Jesus' name or how often they speak in tongues.....no repentance, no salvation.

I have never negated baptism. I believe that the scripture commands baptism and everyone who truly repents and is justified is to be baptized in obedience to scripture. We're having 4 get baptized this morning in response to last Sunday's message. I always baptize in Jesus name.

Sam hit it right on the head. We're not talking about GOOD people. We're talking about GODLY people who have given their lives to Jesus Christ and many of them speak with tongues and have received the HGB and live for God.

We're not talking about "spiritual" people who have had some type of awakening or spiritual experience. We're talking about people who have had an encounter with the Almighty and are as obedient as they know to be.

That is a far cry from someone who blatantly rejects God's word.
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant
http://www.newlife-church.org
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 05-24-2009, 08:10 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
Very good Sam and Mow. I appreciate your posts here.

I cannot say my own experience differs from yours. While I know some wonderful OP Christian people, I know many who exemplify Christian living and show the love of Christ who are not Oneness Pentecostal at all. I count them as nothing less then brothers and sisters in the Lord.
I know many wonderful people that are honest and kind and great neighbors and family and I appreciate them however to be a brother or sister you MUST be born again Jn.3:5 & Acts 2:38. NO one is in the church without a New Father that comes from a new birth. Salvation is NOT by works but by birth.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 05-24-2009, 08:37 AM
Light Light is offline
Solid 3 Stepper


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,802
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
I know many wonderful people that are honest and kind and great neighbors and family and I appreciate them however to be a brother or sister you MUST be born again Jn.3:5 & Acts 2:38. NO one is in the church without a New Father that comes from a new birth. Salvation is NOT by works but by birth.

So true. New birth only comes from obeying Gods command that Peter repeated on the day of Pentecost Acts 2:38. There will be no one in heaven who has not obeyed this command.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 05-24-2009, 09:26 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post

So true. New birth only comes from obeying Gods command that Peter repeated on the day of Pentecost Acts 2:38. There will be no one in heaven who has not obeyed this command.
Amen.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 05-24-2009, 10:10 AM
Sister Alvear's Avatar
Sister Alvear Sister Alvear is offline
Sister Alvear


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brazil, SA
Posts: 27,038
Re: Pros/Cons of the Three-step doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Amen.

amen...
__________________
Monies to help us may be sent to P.O. Box 797, Jonesville, La 71343.

If it is for one of our direct needs please mark it on the check.
Facebook Janice LaVaun Taylor Alvear
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Someone please define 1 step and 3 step theology! Justin Fellowship Hall 59 02-05-2009 01:32 PM
Can somone breakdown what ONE step and THREE step? PraiseHymn Fellowship Hall 10 09-25-2008 09:30 AM
Has Jon Suber embraced the One Step Doctrine? Weary Pilgrim Fellowship Hall 81 08-26-2008 12:50 PM
one-step doctrine Dedicated Mind Fellowship Hall 33 09-14-2007 07:28 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Praxeas

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.