Apostolic Litumus Test: Do you affirm - Yes or no?

[SDG]

Tim here is the grammatical Greek breakdown of Acts 2:38

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Urzmrq8zw

[ManOfWord]

MOW pokes his head in around the corner, looks in and wonders if he should enter................yet another 1 stepper vs 3 stepper discussion or should he just bump the FAMOUS top thread of all time?



Hmmmmmm.............maybe both....we'll see!

[Rico]

Originally Posted by ManOfWord

MOW pokes his head in around the corner, looks in and wonders if he should enter................yet another 1 stepper vs 3 stepper discussion or should he just bump the FAMOUS top thread of all time?



Hmmmmmm.............maybe both....we'll see!

Actually, I think old PP is even against any three steppers who don't vote his way. WUTEVAH!

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Tim here is the grammatical Greek breakdown of Acts 2:38

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Urzmrq8zw

'

Is that John Ankerberg?

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Rico

Actually, I think old PP is even against any three steppers who don't vote his way. WUTEVAH!

He's a modern day Nehemiah and thinks his wall is the stuff.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Rico

'

Is that John Ankerberg?

Yes.

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Rico

'

Is that John Ankerberg?

OK, it is John Ankerberg. This is hilarious. You are going to Baptist to help you prove your case on baptism?!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Rico

OK, it is John Ankerberg. This is hilarious. You are going to Baptist to help you prove your case on baptism?!

You ever use a Trinitarian concordance, commentaries or teach from a bible translated by a trinitarian or read their materials ... be serious ..

.. if this is your refutation ... then study up ...

Just the other day the UPCI Herald published an article in defense of baptismal regeneration pointing to Roman Catholic fathers.

The 3 step crowd often results to this logical fallacy of marginalizing the source ... yet are inconsistent in their applications.

Do you anything to offer on the Greek in reference to Acts 2:38?

Your post is further evidence of the isolationism that has entrenched those in your disfellowship

[Rico]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

You ever use a Trinitarian concordance or teach from a bible translated by a trinitarian or read their materials ... be serious ..

.. if this is your refutation ... then study up ...

Just the other day the UPCI Herald published an article in defense of baptismal regeneration pointing to Roman Catholic fathers.

The 3 step crowd often results to logical fallacy ... yet are inconsistent in their applications.

The reason I find it amusing is because Baptists will put you in Hell in a New York minute for speaking in tongues. This is who you want to use to give credibility to your beliefs on baptism? Come on, Dan. You can do better than that. Can't you find any old time PCI folks' video to share that reinforces your belief? That's what you claim to be, right, a PCIer? Surely, there would be something you could use other than a Baptist who is known for stacking the deck with his theological "debate" program.

[Tim Rutledge]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Tim here is the grammatical Greek breakdown of Acts 2:38

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Urzmrq8zw

I'll need to listen a few more times. If these scholars cannot agree on the subject.. I doubt if I'd be able to decipher it. So.. you beleive at faith/repentance.. your saved? So.. a person would not be being disobedient, if their Pastor was trinity, and did not baptize in Jesus name. A saint cannot be rebelling, if they are doing what their faith/repentance preacher says to do. right? And they would continue to be saved (in this doctrine) without ever being baptized in the name of Jesus. Am I understanding this correctly?