you're kids may not but scripurally you are defenseless against what i described. why? because you and others refute all the teachings and scriptural backing that we use. I never said that you have to be upc or that your kids will end up looking as i mentioned BUT what can you say against it IF IF IF they did ? you believe there are no scriptural grounds against dress.
I certainly am not defenseless, do you think we didn't have boundaries in our house? Brother, prayer is a powerful defense and my wife and I have and still do invoke it liberally, even though all of our children are now over 20 years of age. I don't believe your standards of dress give you near as much protection as you may think. My trust is in the Lord, not in my ability to impose standards. Those that walk in the Spirit abide instinctively within what God requires. Clothes never have prevented lust, adultery, fornication, if it is in the heart in will manifest itself. Get the heart right with God, the outward adornment will be just fine. We focused on right relationship with God for our children, and just modeled modesty in lifestyle, even though it might not quite meet your standards. Of course, we have not accomplished this perfectly, but God is full of grace and has been with us.
__________________ For it is written, "As I live, says the Lord every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall give praise to God. (Romans 14:11- NASB)
The Following Persons are For Men wearing Dresses ! ! ! ! ! Pro Cross dressing members Joy
ILG
Cupcake
Renda
more names coming!
Thad~ This is no way to prove your point, if anything it's proof how little you really know on this subject of Duet 22~ Again please give Bible to back up your teaching.......
We are waiting and it's going to be a long wait at that~ Want to know why? IT"S NOT IN THERE THAD! YOU'VE BEEN DUKE~ ~
what ashamed!!! folks like cup cake who claim to be holy ghost filled believe it's okay for men to wear dresses wigs makeup, long hair. shame!!
I've never said that Thad, please post were I say them words for words above.
Thad your losing ground fast, please give us proof of your teachings, ok! After all if it's bible you should be able to prove it~ Right? Then again when you add and take from the word of God your left with nothing more then confusion ~
we are making Progess Praise Gaaaaaawd!!!!
and that is exactly why you are unfair. who changed this? why did they change it to make it acceptable for women to wear pants???
you asked me that before i think-No, they don't sell dresses in the men's dept here. they probably would be the first should it become in step with hollywood or the style. as soon as a popular movie star wears it in a movie and all the youth want to be different, i wouldn't be surprised if it becomes a future rage.
Thad, when did they change it to make it acceptable for men to wear pants????
And for your 411, women first wore pants in China in the fourth century. Men didn't start wearing them in Europe until about 400 years ago. And when they first started wearing them, they were considered immodest at that!
Haven't we come a long way since then???
And I've never said anything different about cross-dressing. It's wrong now, it's always been wrong, and it will always be wrong.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
I've never said that Thad, please post were I say them words for words above.
Thad your losing ground fast, please give us proof of your teachings, ok! After all if it's bible you should be able to prove it~ Right? Then again when you add and take from the word of God your left with nothing more then confusion ~
I think Thad is pot stirring now.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
Linear Mode
