End Time Army of Women Preachers Psalms 68:11

[Sister Alvear]

most men that stand against women would not have fought with Deborah or humble enough to listen to Huldah...they would not even have listened to the voice of the women proclaiming the risen Christ...strange He would have told the women to go tell the men...

[KeptByTheWord]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Dear ones...my husband and I are doing a marriage retreat....this coming weekend...several couple that I know that will be there are in need of a touch from heaven...please keep this retreat in your prayers...Over 50 couple have registered and more seeing if they can work it out. Bro. Alvear and I are picking up the tab for everyone as a present to all...(However they do not know that yet) We have such a burden to help our young couples.. Until Sat...we have a full schedule at our other churches in this area...2 services today...

Will be praying that the Lord blesses and anoints your time together with these couples this weekend!

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by rdp

Yes M'aam, but what Huldah nor any other woman ever-once did was expound from Scripture to men in a congregation - & you've been shown this over & over & over .


Respectfully, you simply believe what you want to believe - despite the clear biblical data to the contrary.

Huldah's word became scripture. Can you claim the same?

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by rdp

Hmmm, lemme' see.....since the Greek noun translated "Evangelist" always appears in the M-A-S-C-U-L-I-N-E gender & NEVER in the feminine gender "by Paul" - Ummmm, lemme' think it about it & get back to ya' !



You asked for it - I provided it - Next ?

And Bishop is feminine. Anything else you want to 'prove'?

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by rdp

LOL - Nope, read it just fine !


So here, lemme' ask ya' again (since you apparently missed it the first time): Where does this text say that women expounded from the Scriptures to men in a congregation:_________?


It's that lil' pesky word called "context" - you put your foot in your mouth almost every time you post .

Where does it say they cannot? Make sure those exact words are in your scripture since you claim they are there!

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by KeptByTheWord

Lol... well I guess you don't think a woman can open her mouth to say anything good at all. It seems as if you think... "if a woman opens her mouth, she must of course be instructing a man on what to do, and therefore anything she says is not of value, and I will not listen."

That is really sad.

I'm pretty sure much of what he does on here is to make up for what he cannot do at home with his own wife. LOL!

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by ILG

Boy,some of you spend so much time fighting this as if it were the gospel itself. What are you gaining by fighting this? What is God gaining?

What do you know? Aren't you a woman?

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I am noticing that every time you do come back, Sis. Alvear is still a missionary and still sharing the Gospel. I am thinking that she will continue doing that until she is laid in a pine box. Just sayin'...

Maybe if he would do some travelling and evangelizing himself he would be too busy to notice what that woman who isn't his wife is involved in and not concern himself.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Sasha

Maybe if he would do some travelling and evangelizing himself he would be too busy to notice what that woman who isn't his wife is involved in and not concern himself.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by rdp

Just as I said - I knew EXACTLY where you were going. Context determines whether gender has any bearing on an argument.

Right...so you are agreeing with me. It has nothing to do with the gender of a noun

Since the context of Paul's statement is ministry - I find it interesting that in NONE of the offices he mentions does he use the feminine - but ALWAYS the masculine.

I thought it was context that determined whether gender has any bearing. Now you are going back to whether he uses a feminine or masculine noun. again

As I said when Sis. Alvear first attempted to use this argument, noun gender is not ALWAYS a hard & fast rule - but just pointing out her glaring inconsistency.

So we are agreeing with me? Im confused over what you are trying to accomplish. It seems to be your argument.

You are assuming that Paul uses teacher, Apostle, & preacher distinctly - I would argue the polar opposite - that he's using them interchangeably. It ' snit like he changes hats - switching from teaching to preaching ??

Why not? He can change hats and be a Prophet, Apostle, Teacher, Pastor or Evangelist. Why can't he be both a Preacher AND a Teacher? Why mention both in the same sentence if both mean the exact same thing?

Regarding Anna & prophecy - biblical Prophecy has never been taking a text from the scriptural canon & expounding from it to others - which is why the Bible does not record that Anna (nor any other woman) ever did so

Anna is called a Prophetess. You said that was never used in the NT. Since I never addressed the issue of women expounding on scriptures, this is more of a red herring than anything