Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #821  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:18 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingGrace View Post
I dont agree with any of this at all! I dont mean you. I mean it being said and it being published Mark its a new low for ya man
If I had gotten a PM like that I would think that perhaps the person wrote it in anger and after calming down might want to edit it a bit or not have it published for public consumption.

Of course Mark just rushed out and made it public.

I miss BOOM and wish he was here.
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"

Titus2woman on AF
F


"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.

"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.

"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."

Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
Reply With Quote
  #822  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:19 PM
AmazingGrace AmazingGrace is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas,Tx
Posts: 6,978
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
If I had gotten a PM like that I would think that perhaps the person wrote it in anger and after calming down might want to edit it a bit or not have it published for public consumption.

Of course Mark just rushed out and made it public.

I miss BOOM and wish he was here.
Totally agreed here
Reply With Quote
  #823  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:23 PM
rgcraig's Avatar
rgcraig rgcraig is offline
My Family!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by tstew View Post
I think this highlights what I said on another thread. Whenever people don't instill Biblical principles and learn how to guard their heart, and instead live by the letter of a rulebook, they end up unbalanced and unprotected. I have been looking at that avatar everyday and never paid attention to anything innapropriate or thought of anything innapropriate...and I am a man as well.
Exactly!

Rico tell Mrs. Rico thanks!

CC1 thank you too - - she was a beautiful bride!
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
Reply With Quote
  #824  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:37 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
Exactly!

Rico tell Mrs. Rico thanks!

CC1 thank you too - - she was a beautiful bride!
I vote for NOT changing it. It is the prettiest avatar here currently.
Reply With Quote
  #825  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:38 PM
AmericanAngel's Avatar
AmericanAngel AmericanAngel is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southwest, La.
Posts: 917
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

don't change the avator!!!!!!!
__________________
Rom.8:38,39-For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither heigth nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to seperate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.


I AM the VOICE of REASON and SANITY around here!

I am now on FB and on the AFF's on FB!
Reply With Quote
  #826  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:38 PM
AmazingGrace AmazingGrace is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas,Tx
Posts: 6,978
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
I vote for NOT changing it. It is the prettiest avatar here currently.
I agree! But at the same time I am a mother and understand her now wanting to change it since the talk has been made
Reply With Quote
  #827  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:39 PM
Tina Tina is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 6,501
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster View Post
How hypocritical and bitter can people get?

I'll tell you how fair this admin team is. They are so fair they allowed an embittered ex-owner to post his tirade against them. I wonder if he would have allowed them the same sort of latitude?
There are SO many things I could say right now, but it is probably best that I don't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
Well, I did verify that Boom said it was okay for Mark to post this email, so apparently he had something he needed to get off his chest.

My response is ............I'm disappointed.
You and me both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Paths View Post
Thanks.

Couldn't find at least ONE connservative, huh.
There are three, possibly 4 people on the admin team that I consider to be conservative. Esther, Prax, Stephen Hoover, and me. None of us are what I'd call "Ultra con".

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
I am disappointed in both BOOM and St. Mark.

First of all if BOOM wants to blast AFF he should do so himself and not use a surrogate.

Secondly it was just poor taste on St. Marks part to post that PM but I guess I should not be surprised.

In the case of BOOM I am disappointed and in the case of St. Mark disappointed but not surprised.
Yeah, he picked Mark because he knew Mark would get raked over the coals for posting this for him when apparently he wasn't brave enough to post himself. Nice thing to do to a "friend".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman View Post
Some folks get bitter when they can't control or no longer can control others. It's just more than they can handle!
Another time I could say much more, but really need to keep my comments to myself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
I do NOT think Boom lurks but I oculd be wrong?

Boom is a good guy and worked untold hours for this forum and also paid.

So if he comments he is bitter?



For Boom's past service.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
I agree - Boom did put a lot into making NFCF and AFF work. However, so did a lot of others - - he didn't carry the burden alone.

Also, he DID NOT pay the majority of hosting the forum. Not real sure why he would say that.
We do appreciate his past service to this forum, however I also see some of the bitterness that Pianoman picked up on. (And it's not because of the "camp" I consider myself to be part of. ) The bitterness perhaps is because the current Owners of AFF chose to let someone else handle the technical workings of the forum instead of letting him stick around to do that after everything that happened.

As far as the payment for this forum, I think that What was paid and who it was paid by could be verified by StMatt since he was head admin at the time.
__________________
Next Level Web Designs
Reply With Quote
  #828  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:40 PM
the raven the raven is offline
Restricted


 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 220
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

You all are hilarious...the picture is very nice, daughter and all. I was simply stating what a conservative notices first...
Reply With Quote
  #829  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:41 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingGrace View Post
I agree! But at the same time I am a mother and understand her now wanting to change it since the talk has been made
The initial comment seems to be buried pretty far back. I only read the last page and a half.

But I agree. It just takes one dirty old man to ruin everything. If she wants, I can take the picture and photoshop a muslim gown onto it.....
Reply With Quote
  #830  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:42 PM
Quixotic
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixotic View Post
YoU nEVER bRoughT uP DiviSive ISsuEs anD ShAreD InSide PolItiCAl InFormATion (THAt OFten waS falSe and EmBellished) ALL Of LAST yeAR THAt WAs InTendED to CreAtinG HaVOc and DIscOrD BeTWeeN the WArrING SideS?

MArK wIll yOu accEPt yOuR rOLE IN tHIs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixotic View Post
WHy DO yOU aVOid My QuestIONs? WhY do You ConTinUe to Make thIS youR ModE of OpeRatioN?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
No you didn't.

You sent a PM and I wasn't here all day, so you went ahead and posted it.


Just to set the record straight.

Also, Boom heard that "Renda blesses blasting"........how do you bless blasting?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
Sorry, if I had been here and read your request BEFORE you posted it I proably would NOT have allowed you to post it.

However, it's too late to delete it now. Boom apparently needed to get this off his chest.

I would like to publically thank Boom for NOT deleting AFF - it would NOT have been right for him to have done that at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
I am disappointed in both BOOM and St. Mark.

First of all if BOOM wants to blast AFF he should do so himself and not use a surrogate.

Secondly it was just poor taste on St. Marks part to post that PM but I guess I should not be surprised.

In the case of BOOM I am disappointed and in the case of St. Mark disappointed but not surprised.

MaRK, wILL yOU SteP uP aND taKe ReSPONsibiliTY?

Do yoU SeE a PATtern, MARk?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why The Fuss? I Thought The Libs Didn't Care If The Cons Left?? Old Paths Fellowship Hall 73 07-25-2008 10:58 AM
The Real Reason Thad Stopped Posting The Anchorman The Tab 11 10-15-2007 10:00 AM
The REAL Reason Daniel Was In The Lion's Den Actaeon Fellowship Hall 14 04-06-2007 06:46 PM
" THE REAL REASON FOR THE UPCI's $25 Fee " Bishop1 Fellowship Hall 11 04-04-2007 07:52 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.