Are there any conservative PCI believers out there?

[The Dean]

Originally Posted by Felicity

Sorry to burst your bubble sir but I know lots of PCI people who have VERY strong standards. Do you want names? I can provide them!

Again, I have no dog in this fight and no bubble to burst. Just thought it would be an interesting thread.

Unless I misunderstood him I think Charlie Brown was looking for specific names, yes.

[Felicity]

I get so almighty SICK of hearing all this foolishness and measuring one against another.

[Felicity]

Originally Posted by The Dean

Again, I have no dog in this fight and no bubble to burst. Just thought it would be an interesting thread.

Unless I misunderstood him I think Charlie Brown was looking for specific names, yes.

What difference would names make? They would mean NOTHING absolute nada nothing zilch to you, sir! Or to Charlie Brown either.

[Scott Hutchinson]

Did not the PCI organization hold to tradtional classical pentecostal standards,where not the PAJC,and PCI compatible standard wise?

[The Dean]

Originally Posted by Felicity

I get so SICK of hearing all this foolishness and measuring one against another.

Seriously? I thought it was a legitimate question once I read the thread. Does PCI = low standards? I think it's a given that PAJC does NOT always = good standards.

My opinion is that there are no 'measurements' here at all. At least if what I'm reading is correct. I think he's asking if the PCI = low standards is a fact or not. I can see someone wanting some solid examples that its not really that way.

But, then again, maybe I'm reading it wrong.

[The Dean]

Originally Posted by Felicity

What difference would names make? They would mean NOTHING absolute nada nothing zilch to you, sir! Or to Charlie Brown either.

Wow! Do I sense some animosity? I read a thread. I comment on the thread. I try to inquire as to why nobody was giving a real answer.

Sorry. I'm not the enemy. Of all people on this forum I'm shocked that you think I am.

[The Dean]

Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson

Did not the PCI organization hold to tradtional classical pentecostal standards,where not the PAJC,and PCI compatible standard wise?

I was under that impression.

[Felicity]

Originally Posted by The Dean

Seriously? I thought it was a legitimate question once I read the thread. Does PCI = low standards? I think it's a given that PAJC does NOT always = good standards.

My opinion is that there are no 'measurements' here at all. At least if what I'm reading is correct. I think he's asking if the PCI = low standards is a fact or not. I can see someone wanting some solid examples that its not really that way.

But, then again, maybe I'm reading it wrong.

But I've already told you sir - the answer is no!

But what if the answer was yes i.e. PCI = low standards. So what?

In other words that PCI women cut/trim their hair, watch TV, wear skirts that have slits, wear makeup, etc., how does that make them different than their dear PAJC counterparts?

[Scott Hutchinson]

Looking at merger and pre-merger pictures both groups looked the same as most Pentecostal groups even Trinity Pentecostal groups did.

[Felicity]

Originally Posted by The Dean

Wow! Do I sense some animosity? I read a thread. I comment on the thread. I try to inquire as to why nobody was giving a real answer.

Sorry. I'm not the enemy. Of all people on this forum I'm shocked that you think I am.

No, sir. You are not the enemy. The enemy is hypocrisy, division and prejudice which is the fruit that this kind of thinking and questioning produces.