Baptism in the Name of the.....

[Eniratak]

Wow.
I've read this whole thing and I believe I've come to a conclusion.
Would God really look over a baptism that was made in the titles instead of in the name of Jesus?
Perhaps the Word does say 'baptize in the name of Jesus' or what have you, but doesn't God realize who you are speaking of when you are immersed in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?
I think it's rather pointless to be arguing about such things especially when people from both baptismal histories have come out from under the water speaking in tongues, yeah?
People's opinions vary on the 'correct' interpretation of the Bible, but as long as they follow what's in their hearts and what God has told them, does it really make them that wrong?
Just my two cents.

[mfblume]

When people can get the Holy Ghost talking in tongues without having been baptized, and yet Peter still demanded baptism (Acts 10), it does not matter if someone spoke in tongues after titular baptism. Tongues do not validate it.