|
Tab Menu 1
| Deep Waters 'Deep Calleth Unto Deep ' -The place to go for Ministry discussions. Please keep it civil. Remember to discuss the issues, not each other. |
 |
|
09-18-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Was Paul promoting spiritual immaturity in this verse?
Or is it one of the verses that shouldn't be in the Bible?
Rom 16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Somewhat. I am wondering if I still belong here.
You never answered the question about whether you were familiar with or had ever studied the sacred feminine concept.
|
Not in depth, I am aware of which you speak. Thread your thoughts and I would be happy to spar with you.
|
09-18-2007, 04:53 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyhomie
The doctrine Paul taught was one of Grace. The judaisers were trying to get the newly founded church to return back to the ordinances of the old covenant. We do need to stand against anyone who tells us it takes a list of do's and don't to be accepted by Christ into His kingdom. When He said it was finished, He meant it.
|
Homie,
Better take another look at the back of your hand.
That was Galatians, not Romans.
|
09-18-2007, 04:54 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyhomie
Not in depth, I am aware of which you speak. Thread your thoughts and I would be happy to spar with you.
|
No thoughts that need threading.
I just wanted to know.
|
09-18-2007, 04:54 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,749
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyhomie
The doctrine Paul taught was one of Grace. The judaisers were trying to get the newly founded church to return back to the ordinances of the old covenant. We do need to stand against anyone who tells us it takes a list of do's and don't to be accepted by Christ into His kingdom. When He said it was finished, He meant it.
|
Whether you like it or not, there are some do's and don'ts.
We are commanded to love one another for a starter. If you hate your brethren you are not of God.
Without holiness no man shall see the Lord. We must be holy.
We must be born again. Water and Spirit.
Unless you believe once you are saved you are always saved?
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE....  My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?
To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
|
09-18-2007, 04:56 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
Whether you like it or not, there are some do's and don'ts.
We are commanded to love one another for a starter. If you hate your brethren you are not of God.
Without holiness no man shall see the Lord. We must be holy.
We must be born again. Water and Spirit.
Unless you believe once you are saved you are always saved?
|
This is true.
Our resident Bible scholar is doing his best to deflect direct questions and redefine terms.
But he still has Galatians and Romans confused on the post you quoted.
|
09-18-2007, 04:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Homie,
Better take another look at the back of your hand.
That was Galatians, not Romans.
|
I'm not used to christians trying to trick others. I usually never bother to ck behind a real man of God...
|
09-18-2007, 04:58 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
Whether you like it or not, there are some do's and don'ts.
We are commanded to love one another for a starter. If you hate your brethren you are not of God.
Without holiness no man shall see the Lord. We must be holy.
We must be born again. Water and Spirit.
Unless you believe once you are saved you are always saved?
|
What happened to the thief on the cross?
|
09-18-2007, 04:59 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
This is true.
Our resident Bible scholar is doing his best to deflect direct questions and redefine terms.
But he still has Galatians and Romans confused on the post you quoted.
|
Whatever happened to my apology?
|
09-18-2007, 05:00 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyhomie
I'm not used to christians trying to trick others. I usually never bother to ck behind a real man of God...
|
Nice try.
You were caught in another pretty basic Scriptural error, and you accuse me of trying to trick you?
No tricks there--you just demonstrated once again that the back of your hand might not be quite as familiar as you claim.
really, this particular attack doesn't even make sense.
Check behind me for what?
|
09-18-2007, 05:02 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyhomie
What happened to the thief on the cross?
|
Oh please...the kids in my youth class can answer that.
he was before the death, burial, resurrection, and Pentecost.
Once again, your Bible knowledge is showing up real thin.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
