Effective evangelists?

[votivesoul]

Sean, that's not what the copyright at Cambridge states. It is the text, THE TEXT of the King James Bible, that is copyrighted.

Rights in The Authorized Version of the Bible (King James Bible) in the United Kingdom are vested in the Crown and administered by the Crown’s patentee, Cambridge University Press. The reproduction by any means of the text of the King James Version is permitted to a maximum of five hundred (500) verses for liturgical and non-commercial educational use, provided that the verses quoted neither amount to a complete book of the Bible nor represent 25 per cent or more of the total text of the work in which they are quoted, subject to the following acknowledgement being included:

Scripture quotations from The Authorized (King James) Version. Rights in the Authorized Version in the United Kingdom are vested in the Crown. Reproduced by permission of the Crown’s patentee, Cambridge University Press

When quotations from the KJV text are used in materials not being made available for sale, such as church bulletins, orders of service, posters, presentation materials, or similar media, a complete copyright notice is not required but the initials KJV must appear at the end of the quotation.

Rights or permission requests (including but not limited to reproduction in commercial publications) that exceed the above guidelines must be directed to the Permissions Department, Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK (http://www.cambridge.org/about-us/ri...ions-requests/) and approved in writing.

Source: http://www.cambridge.org/bibles/abou...nd-permissions

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sean, have you read her books?



Have YOU read her books and material?

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sean, I read her book in 1993, when did you read it? I have a copy right in front of me. Where is your copy?

Sean, did you read any of Gail Riplinger's books? For some odd reason you won't touch top side and bottom of this question? Why?

Also, since you are KJV then you obviously use the Deuterocanonical books. So, can you please tell us why they were removed in In 1826, since 1611 KJV, there are some 102 verse cross-references (11 in the New Testament) to Deuterocanonical books? Why do you still use these books, since they were removed by British and Foreign Bible Society? Also, what gave the British and Foreign Bible Society the authority to remove these books from the KJV?

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sean, did you read any of Gail Riplinger's books? For some odd reason you won't touch top side and bottom of this question? Why?

Also, since you are KJV then you obviously use the Deuterocanonical books. So, can you please tell us why they were removed in In 1826, since 1611 KJV, there are some 102 verse cross-references (11 in the New Testament) to Deuterocanonical books? Why do you still use these books, since they were removed by British and Foreign Bible Society? Also, what gave the British and Foreign Bible Society the authority to remove these books from the KJV?

[Sean]

I like her video. i only like this certain video to show folks. I dont care what else she has to say.(Most UPC pastors say preterists are going to hell as heretics, but I dont care what they say...I have my opinion)............



...................













.......................

[Sean]

Aaron...check it out...

Copyright status[edit]
The Authorized Version is in the public domain in most of the world. However, in the United Kingdom, the right to print, publish and distribute it is a Royal prerogative and the Crown licenses publishers to reproduce it under letters patent. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland the letters patent are held by the Queen's Printer, and in Scotland by the Scottish Bible Board. The office of Queen's Printer has been associated with the right to reproduce the Bible for centuries, the earliest known reference coming in 1577. In the 18th century all surviving interests in the monopoly were bought out by John Baskett. The Baskett rights descended through a number of printers and, in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the Queen's Printer is now Cambridge University Press, who inherited the right when they took over the firm of Eyre & Spottiswoode in 1990.[155]

Other royal charters of similar antiquity grant Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press the right to produce the Authorized Version independently of the Queen's Printer. In Scotland the Authorized Version is published by Collins under licence from the Scottish Bible Board. The terms of the letters patent prohibit any other than the holders, or those authorized by the holders, from printing, publishing or importing the Authorized Version into the United Kingdom. The protection that the Authorized Version, and also the Book of Common Prayer, enjoy is the last remnant of the time when the Crown held a monopoly over all printing and publishing in the United Kingdom.[155] All provisions granting copyright in perpetuity were abolished by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, but because the Authorized Version is protected by royal prerogative rather than copyright, it will remain protected, as specified in CDPA s171(1)(b) .

Permission[edit]
Cambridge University Press permits the reproduction of at most 500 verses for "liturgical and non-commercial educational use" if their prescribed acknowledgement is included, the quoted verses do not exceed 25% of the publication quoting them and do not include a complete Bible book.[156] For use beyond this, the Press is willing to consider permission requested on a case-by-case basis and in 2011 a spokesman said the Press generally does not charge a fee but tries to ensure that a reputable source text is used.[157][158]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...yOo05M0dIBao-A





Thats so the crazy's dont louse up the KJV in England. (England cannot sue anyone outside their jurisdiction)

[Sean]

Aaron, did you watch the video?

Did you give up after 5 minutes?

If so, you hurt me in a bad kinda way...LOL


http://i.ytimg.com/vi/K1vZq3bTS_Y/maxresdefault.jpg


LOL

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Sean

Aaron, did you watch the video?

Did you give up after 5 minutes?

If so, you hurt me in a bad kinda way...LOL


http://i.ytimg.com/vi/K1vZq3bTS_Y/maxresdefault.jpg

Hey, watch my Gail Riplinger video instead.

It's shorter, and in it Riplinger claims the Titanic will sink the NIV (or did sink, or is the mark of the Beast, or something like that), and it also reveals the fact that Riplinger is NOT scholarly.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Sean

I like her video. i only like this certain video to show folks. I dont care what else she has to say.(Most UPC pastors say preterists are going to hell as heretics, but I dont care what they say...I have my opinion)............



...................



.......................

So, are you saying that you NEVER read any of Riplinger's books?

It's hard to tell since you've been so unwilling to answer such a simple question.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sean, have you read her books?



Have YOU read her books and material?

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sean, I read her book in 1993, when did you read it? I have a copy right in front of me. Where is your copy?

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Sean, did you read any of Gail Riplinger's books? For some odd reason you won't touch top side and bottom of this question? Why?

Also, since you are KJV then you obviously use the Deuterocanonical books. So, can you please tell us why they were removed in In 1826, since 1611 KJV, there are some 102 verse cross-references (11 in the New Testament) to Deuterocanonical books? Why do you still use these books, since they were removed by British and Foreign Bible Society? Also, what gave the British and Foreign Bible Society the authority to remove these books from the KJV?

Sean, did you read any of Gail Riplinger's books? Did you read New Age Bible Versions? Mine is highlighted, how about yours?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

So, are you saying that you NEVER read any of Riplinger's books?

It's hard to tell since you've been so unwilling to answer such a simple question.

Brother Burk, as long as you have known me, have I ever, ever, said anything bad about the King James Bible? Because I have NEVER heard you say anything against the KJV.