NEW Standard Debate in the UPC! "Girls Leggings"!!!

[Tech]

Originally Posted by Thad

that's so sad. folks, can you believe there are people who do not believe there should be any gender distinctions ?

you can try to rationalize it away on logic but I truely believe that boys should not wear wedding gowns while the girl wears the tux. sorry you feel otherwise

God took care of the gender distiction himself.Have you not noticed?

[Tech]

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

Well, there's the one verse on women not cutting their hair, the one verse where women can't wear jewelry, and the one verse where women can't wear pants.

Makes you wonder why those verses seem to be more important for folks than the many verses that speak about not judging your brother.

Thats true there are several that cause division.All having to do with apperance.No matter what the what God has done for the inside.SAD

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Tech

God took care of the gender distiction himself.Have you not noticed?

Ya think that'd be enough, wouldn't ya?

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Tech

God took care of the gender distiction himself.Have you not noticed?

Indeed, He did! Both Renda & Newman described the distinctions quite well.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by The Mrs

Yes, and no. I can't get my sleep cycle right..and I got a head cold. Other than that, it's wonderful being here and getting to see the culture here.

Oh, hopefully you'll get better soon - nothing worse than being on an airplane for a hundred hours with a head cold!

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne

And where in the Bible does it say that the top part of a garment can be similar but the overall garment be different?

I would like to know this answer, myself.

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by Thad

that's so sad. folks, can you believe there are people who do not believe there should be any gender distinctions ?

you can try to rationalize it away on logic but I truely believe that boys should not wear wedding gowns while the girl wears the tux. sorry you feel otherwise

Thad, if you can't address what I actually said then I have nothing to discuss with you. Letting your imagination put words in my mouth isn't having honest discussion.

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Ya think that'd be enough, wouldn't ya?

You'd think, but then how can we tell who is holy and who isn't?

[HeavenlyOne]

Originally Posted by Subdued

I would like to know this answer, myself.

Thad doesn't have scripture and probably is embarrassed that I'm pointing out that he is just repeating what others have told him. I was embarrassed too, as I used to do the same thing, so I took it upon myself and researched this issue for a long time, and I still continue with the research.

I try not to make statements apply as doctrine without scripture. Thad is doing just that....applying statements without scripture. I can do that in just applying my beliefs to myself, but not for others.

[Thad]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Ya think that'd be enough, wouldn't ya?

anatomy is all that matters ....umm okay.

so the butch look on women is okay , men in drag, that's okay too because it's all old testament law goodness! It's what's in the heart after all, there should be no rules.