Changing To Preterism from Rapture Doctrine

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by shazeep

yes, Reader, perhaps you should start another thread
maybe include a curse for anyone who ignores the parameters or something

It would not help, curse or not it would be ignored and the thread would just end up getting clogged like all the other threads.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Sean

Indeed so!

We have been included into the future promise(found in Hebrews 8 and Jer. 31) of Millennial Israel....

Heb. 10:15 Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before,

16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.

If you reject this inclusion of the Church into Israels' promise of Jer. 31, then you are officially teaching replacement theology!

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by Sean

So you think we REPLACED Israel, Loren?!!!!!

Where in the world do you get that Sean, learn to read. We never replace anyone. There you go with your lies again.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Sean

If you reject this inclusion of the Church into Israels' promise of Jer. 31, then you are officially teaching replacement theology!

Learn how to read.

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by Godsdrummer

It would not help, curse or not it would be ignored and the thread would just end up getting clogged like all the other threads.

ya, guess so; maybe it's not even a bad thing. Sean has definitely made me more firmly preterist

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by Sean

Folks, we have 2 replacement theology teachers here

Welcome Mike and Loren!

Lies and misrepresentation from someone that cannot read!

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Godsdrummer

Lies and misrepresentation from someone that cannot read!

I've seen many adults miss things in context, but this guy takes the cake for not even being able to read!

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by Sean

If you reject this inclusion of the Church into Israels' promise of Jer. 31, then you are officially teaching replacement theology!

IF YOU TEACH THAT THE CHURCH TODAY IS NOT INCLUSIVE OF JEWS AND GENTILES YOU TEACH REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY!

If you teach the Jews must wait for some future time to receive their promise you are teaching replacement theology.

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by shazeep

ya, guess so; maybe it's not even a bad thing. Sean has definitely made me more firmly preterist

ROTFL

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Godsdrummer

IF YOU TEACH THAT THE CHURCH TODAY IS NOT INCLUSIVE OF JEWS AND GENTILES YOU TEACH REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY!

If you teach the Jews must wait for some future time to receive their promise you are teaching replacement theology.

Exactly! It's not replacement, it's INCLUSION/. But some folks cannot read.

Dispensationalism says the JEWS will be the leaders of the world and the Church in the future. Meanwhile God tore down the middle wall of partition between Jew and Gentile in the cross, and that means there is neither Jew nor Gentile in the Church. And that means God will not exalt a Jew or gentile above the other. Otherwise He is a transgressor and builds up what he tore down. Dispensationalism makes God a transgressor.

Eph 2:14 KJV For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

Gal 2:18 KJV For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.

Gal 3:28 KJV There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Col 3:11 KJV Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Dispensationalism is vile and teaches the racism and the building up of what God destroyed.