I Will Aoplogize To Dom - Page 6

Michael The Disciple · #51 06-06-2019, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

Some guy asked brother Benincasa a couple of direct questions, and here was the response:

So the idea that he just doesnt answer questions is simply false. *I've* never had a problem asking him questions.

So, as my dad used to tell me all the time, "Sounds like a personal problem. Life in the big city doowah diddy."

And how far did you have to dig to find that answer. I clicked the link you gave about the debate and read the 4 pages there. Then I went to the link within the debate and have read 10 pages so far.

I finally found this confession by Dom.

Quote:

I affirm that Matthew 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13 are past and all fulfilled in 70 A.D.

Signed Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

Now I dont know where you found the quote by Dom Im certainly glad you did. Nonetheless in ALL my contending and wrangling with Dom......NOT ONCE did he make such a clear answer as that. He did all he could do to evade saying what he said in the quote you have produced by him.

If he would have said what he said in your quote of him to ME I would have noted it long ago.

Thank you very much for the quote.

Michael The Disciple · #52 06-06-2019, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

A simple yes or no would have answered my first question. And a simple explanation would have answered my second. I really did not want to wade through an entire thread to get an answer for what I asked you. So, can you please just respond?

This is hilarious even to a guy who doesnt do humor well!

A simple yes or no? I have asked Dom about his full preterists beliefs multiple times over a long period of time . When not evading or dodging he tells me to go to the Eschatology section! He never even provided a link!

And yet when I point you right to 3 links that are very detailed what I believe about holiness and perfection you say you dont want to waste time wading through ONE THREAD to hear it? All you want is yes or no?

Be ye therefore perfect EVEN AS your Father in Heaven is perfect. Matt 5:48

My doctrine is in this context. Now go and listen to the 3 videos which together are less than an hour.

Unless you injecting that into the thread for distraction purposes.

This is the standard for every Christian that ever lived.

Esaias · #53 06-06-2019, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

And how far did you have to dig to find that answer. I clicked the link you gave about the debate and read the 4 pages there. Then I went to the link within the debate and have read 10 pages so far.

I finally found this confession by Dom.

Now I dont know where you found the quote by Dom Im certainly glad you did. Nonetheless in ALL my contending and wrangling with Dom......NOT ONCE did he make such a clear answer as that. He did all he could do to evade saying what he said in the quote you have produced by him.

If he would have said what he said in your quote of him to ME I would have noted it long ago.

Thank you very much for the quote.

Have you ever considered that his responses to you are what they are, NOT because he's "hiding" something, but because perhaps you yourself have brought on those kinds of responses?

The guy's been around since, what? The days of the original FCF? If anyone genuinely doesnt know his eschatology it is either because they are new here, or willfully ignorant. Like I have been saying, the only people who seem to actually have any communication problems with him are certain individuals who have some kind of personal problem with him. Usually due to him pointing out some silliness on their part, then they double down on the silliness, and then they get trolled ("taunted" and "tormented").

I distinctly remember several times you made a statement, and when *I* asked you to clarify all I got in response was a bunch of questions from you followed by what looked like gloating about how I wouldn't and couldn't answer your questions because obviously I was lacking in any kind of actual doctrine. I think they call that "projection", maybe?

Getting straightforward answers usually requires a certain amount of respect for the questioner. When that is missing the questioner shouldn't really expect anything.

Michael The Disciple · #54 06-06-2019, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Have you ever considered that his responses to you are what they are, NOT because he's "hiding" something, but because perhaps you yourself have brought on those kinds of responses?

I brought them on by asking him to present his belief in a straight forward manner so I and others would know what they are?

Quote:

The guy's been around since, what? The days of the original FCF? If anyone genuinely doesnt know his eschatology it is either because they are new here, or willfully ignorant. Like I have been saying, the only people who seem to actually have any communication problems with him are certain individuals who have some kind of personal problem with him. Usually due to him pointing out some silliness on their part, then they double down on the silliness, and then they get trolled ("taunted" and "tormented").

Was I being willfully ignorant by asking him what it was he DOES believe? Many times? I even asked him on THIS THREAD. He did not answer here either after all that.

It is YOU who have pointed out to me what he has taught here before in his own words. At any time he could have done that. Then if anyone cared the discussion could have moved forward.

What you rightly describe as "taunting" and "tormenting" is very accurate. I guess its ok because I am so silly.

Quote:

I distinctly remember several times you made a statement, and when *I* asked you to clarify all I got in response was a bunch of questions from you followed by what looked like gloating about how I wouldn't and couldn't answer your questions because obviously I was lacking in any kind of actual doctrine. I think they call that "projection", maybe?

Getting straightforward answers usually requires a certain amount of respect for the questioner. When that is missing the questioner shouldn't really expect anything.

Thats funny I think I remember the same kind of thing coming from you in some of our discussions!

I do appreciate the link you sent and I respect your teaching on various issues,

TakingDominion · #55 06-06-2019, 09:06 AM

I see it's starting to get back to normal 'round here.

Esaias · #56 06-06-2019, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Oh? Now you are saying you never denied you are a full preterist?

Well then I was right about you all along. There is no apology necessary to you. You have lied and deceived through many threads and posts.

You say you deny A RAPTURE took place in 70ad.

This is the way Prets operate. Take a word and strangle the life out of it so you can hide behind what you really believe.

The whole point has been did what is commonly called the rapture altho all it means is the saints being gathered to Christ for immortality occur in 70ad. Did the resurrection of the dead in Christ occur in 70ad.

So to confuse and blur the issue you deny a "rapture" happened. But you believe Jesus came and gathered the saints.

OK.

Signed by you.

So what most Christians call the rapture or at least the gathering together of Christians to Jesus you affirm happened in 70ad.

Thats what I have been saying all along.

You are a liar and a deceiver.

Honestly, I don't think you are malicious. I do however think you either may be going senile or you have trouble with reading comprehension.

Esaias · #57 06-06-2019, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakingDominion

I see it's starting to get back to normal 'round here.

So we'll be seeing more of you, then? Good!

Ehud · #58 06-06-2019, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

Getting straightforward answers usually requires a certain amount of respect for the questioner. When that is missing the questioner shouldn't really expect anything.