Daniel's 70th week

[Michael The Disciple]

The whole point is this, if I can be accused of blasphemy where is this found in the New Testament?

I never accused you of blasphemy. I was trying to warn you NOT to. Please be careful.

So far the Yahwists just run to Revelation to show Αλληλούια?

Isnt 4 times in scripture enough to prove the seriousness of a matter?

That Jesus and the Apostles were Yahwists.

Ok lets get this straight. Jesus was Hebrew. He had the Old Testament.

It reads in Psalms 68:4

4Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rides upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him.

So the God of the OT was YAH.......yet Jesus was not a "YAHIST"?

His God was YAH but he was NOT a YAHIST?

I mean really, if Jesus was the God of the OT he WAS YAH!

[TakingDominion]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I never accused you of blasphemy. I was trying to warn you NOT to. Please be careful.



Isnt 4 times in scripture enough to prove the seriousness of a matter?



Ok lets get this straight. Jesus was Hebrew. He had the Old Testament.

It reads in Psalms 68:4

4Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rides upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him.

So the God of the OT was YAH.......yet Jesus was not a "YAHIST"?

His God was YAH but he was NOT a YAHIST?

I mean really, if Jesus was the God of the OT he WAS YAH!

Mike, do you baptize, pray or rebuke in the name of YAH?

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by TakingDominion

Mike, do you baptize, pray or rebuke in the name of YAH?

I do all in the name of Jesus/Yeshua. I do this because he is the visible revelation of YAH.

At times I do lift up glorious praise unto YAH exactly like we see in Rev. 19:1-6

[Apostolic1ness]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I do all in the name of Jesus/Yeshua. I do this because he is the visible revelation of YAH.

At times I do lift up glorious praise unto YAH exactly like we see in Rev. 19:1-6

Then the focus of your praise is unto the Lamb, the Lord of lords Jesus the one that is on the one throne of God and the Lamb. Right?

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by Apostolic1ness

Then the focus of your praise is unto the Lamb, the Lord of lords Jesus the one that is on the one throne of God and the Lamb. Right?

See post 53.

[Michael The Disciple]

So how did a thread on Daniels 70 weeks get turned into an attack on "YAH"?

See post 20. Whenever Dom sees the name YAH, which is highly honored in both Testaments he feels he must attack it. He personally attacks me for using it.

I have never told anyone on the Forum here they must use the name YAH. I highly regard this name because it represents the person of God.

When I say I believe Jesus is God, what that means to me is that Jesus is YAH.

[Ehud]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

So how did a thread on Daniels 70 weeks get turned into an attack on "YAH"?

See post 20. Whenever Dom sees the name YAH, which is highly honored in both Testaments he feels he must attack it. He personally attacks me for using it.

I have never told anyone on the Forum here they must use the name YAH. I highly regard this name because it represents the person of God.

When I say I believe Jesus is God, what that means to me is that Jesus is YAH.

Good evening, Michael!

Is 'YAH' a proper name or is it just another way of saying 'God' or 'Lord'? I, too, believe Jesus is God, but I've never once thought to refer to Jesus by any other name. (I'm sure this is explained elsewhere, but the back and forth can be difficult for me to follow.)

Thank you for your time!

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

So how did a thread on Daniels 70 weeks get turned into an attack on "YAH"?

Mike what these two words? Αλλη λούια

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

See post 20. Whenever Dom sees the name YAH, which is highly honored in both Testaments he feels he must attack it. He personally attacks me for using it.

Stop making yourself a victim. First it isn't highly honored in the New Testament. Why? Because you can't find the word YAH in the new testament.

What is this word? "λούια" Is this the name of God?

Can you use Alhamdulillah, and still be praising God?

Think very carefully before you answer.

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I have never told anyone on the Forum here they must use the name YAH.

You said I was in danger of blaspheming YAH! Why should anyone be careful to not blaspheme a verb? How about EHYEH?

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I highly regard this name because it represents the person of God.

You highly regard it because it is Hebrew envy. Plain and simple. You use a language you have NEVER LEARNED. Mike, that is like using Japanese words with out a clue to the exact meaning of those words. Who does that? The only ones I know are Christians who feel in someway that Hebrew is a holy language. Like Catholics and Greek Orthodox see Latin and Greek as religious languages.

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

When I say I believe Jesus is God, what that means to me is that Jesus is YAH.

Again, why???

YAH is EHYEH asher EHYEH I will be or shall be , what I will or shall be. Mike, for crying out loud, that is speaking of Jesus Christ. God being Jesus Christ. Mike, you teach YAH when no one in the New Testament taught it> Jesus was a Judean, the line of the Hebrews, but even He never said that verb once in the New Testament. Never ever in prayer, we would have the evidence if He did. No apostles, or Paul ever once mentioned it. You Mike, mention that verb more than Jesus or His apostles. You do it because of some belief you have concerning a language you don't even know.

[Michael The Disciple]

You highly regard it because it is Hebrew envy. Plain and simple. You use a language you have NEVER LEARNED.

Dom,

Apostolics praise YAH all the time. It is something done by all Pentecostals and Charismatics.

Practically every meeting Spirit filled believers raise this praise!

HALLELUJAH.......!

According to the two most trusted Hebrew/Greek Concordances this means:

PRAISE YAH!

Are Apostolics sinning by saying HALLELUJAH in praising God because they dont speak in fluent Hebrew?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I never accused you of blasphemy. I was trying to warn you NOT to. Please be careful.

For the Love of God, Mike! Where do we have Paul warning anyone of the above???? Where does Jesus admonish anyone concerning this? Your warning is Babylonian Talmudic Rabbinical in nature. Hence the reason they call God "THE NAME" HASHEM. Again, Hebrew Roots brings us right back to the arms of the Rabbi. I don't have to worry about Catholics, Baptists, Mormons, or Hindus. I would never allow them into my pulpit on a bet. But I personally know Apostolic Churches who allowed RABBIS to preach in their pulpits. Why???? Because you see them as partial Christians. That all they need to do is get an ecclesiastical Hebrew epiphany and eureka! You have a full saint of God. In your case YAH. Messianic Judaism 101.

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Isnt 4 times in scripture enough to prove the seriousness of a matter?

It isn't YAH Mike!!! Please, please pronounce this Greek word "λούια!!"

Does that sound like YAH!!!!

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

Ok lets get this straight. Jesus was Hebrew. He had the Old Testament.

It reads in Psalms 68:4

4Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rides upon the heavens by his name YAH, and rejoice before him.

Jesus was a Hebrew, a Judean. Living in a Hellenized Judea, under Gentile occupation of Greek speakers for hundreds of years before His birth.

If He would of sang the Psalm in the New Testament we would of read this...
ᾄσατε τῷ θεῷ ψάλατε τῷ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ ὁδοποιήσατε τῷ ἐπιβεβηκότι ἐπὶ δυσμῶν κύριος ὄνομα αὐτῷ καὶ ἀγαλλιᾶσθε ἐνώπιον αὐτοῦ ταραχθήσονται ἀπὸ προσώπου αὐτοῦ. No YAH anywhere.

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

So the God of the OT was YAH.......yet Jesus was not a "YAHIST"?

Jesus wasn't a Yahist Mike. You are.

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

His God was YAH but he was NOT a YAHIST?

Emphasize on the word "WAS"

But, NO, Jesus wasn't using a Hebrew word YAH. He certainly did care about it as much as you. Warning someone to be careful. Good grief, dod you wear a kipa?

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I mean really, if Jesus was the God of the OT he WAS YAH!

Jesus isn't a was, Jesus is a is. He is the God, of the now. He doesn't need to become, or will be. He is with us.