Steadfast is GLAD to see Richard Perry!

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

IS there going to be another MEETING prior to GC '07???

Not sure. How about if we form one and just disagree with everyone?

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by rrford

Come on now. How is that any worse that what others receive at time to some of their posts? Are you going to agree with him that it was a WITCHHUNT? How about correcting him for using such a term consideruing what it implies?

Wasn't there. I only know what "my friends" shared (wink wink).

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

And if a group organized with the expressed intent of subverting or changing the AOF? How would you speak about that sort of meeting? Would that type of free expression be allowable?

Is that what you are saying these guys were doing? Or was there meeting only to continue to strengthen and uphold the existing AOF? I don't recall any discussion about changing the AOF while I was there at the evening meetings.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Who cares who attended ... Stead ....

Let's just call a spade a spade.

This post is simply confusing.

Cons and libs.
Grass roots and officials.
Dealt with TV and dealt with more than TV.
If that's the spade you refer to... it's a spade.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Wasn't there. I only know what "my friends" shared (wink wink).

So, the WITCHHUNT term is okay with you?

[SDG]

Originally Posted by rrford

Is that what you are saying these guys were doing? Or was there meeting only to continue to strengthen and uphold the existing AOF?

The existing AOF is amendable ... is it not ... or will the UC's commitment to the rule of law only apply to the agenda???

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by rrford

Is that what you are saying these guys were doing? Or was there meeting only to continue to strengthen and uphold the existing AOF? I don't recall any discussion about changing the AOF while I was there at the evening meetings.

From what I hear, the underlying intent was to formulate an exit strategy if the crybabies didn't get their way in Columbus. Is that where the whole "Concerned Conservative Apostolic" idea was born?

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by rrford

So, the WITCHHUNT term is okay with you?

I didn't use that word.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

The existing AOF is amendable ... is it not ... or will the UC's commitment to the rule of law only apply to the agenda???

I am not sure what you are asking. I have always been one who has contended fo rthe right of every licensed minster to work for any change they felt was necessary. Whether it is to the AOF or Position Papers or whatever, they have the right to work within the defined guidelines for change to effect change. Go for it...

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

I didn't use that word.

I well realize that. But you were questioning my usage of a word in response to that word. Seems like we either need to forget your questioning of my word(s) or question both words.