Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 05-21-2008, 07:33 PM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
ya'll call me when they start baptizing right.
Ferd

I am not trying to get an 1 stepper and 3 stepper debate started here. Neverhteless, Have you ever sat back and thought about the early days of the latter day outpouring. I mean can you imagine being in a pray meeting at Azusa. I have read many stories about common women and men involved in these prayer meetings -- praying in the spirit and a man or woman from a foreign land walking in and hearing their own language (like in Acts 2).

Well all of these people were at that time trinitarians. Jesus name baptism did not become an issue for more than 8 to 5 years later.

My point in all of this is we easily brag about the topeka and azusa occurences as if these people our part of are heritage and yet they were all trinitarians. I believe strongly in Jesus name baptism (I got rebaptized in Jesus name), but I don't forget that those first oneness believers wanted to stay in the AG and they wanted to fellowship with those people.

What happens to them should concern us!
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-21-2008, 07:34 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,789
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes View Post
I have been informed that at the next General Council there will be a serious debate amongst the AGs concerning the intial evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit. The majority of the AC churches that are located outside of the Bible belt are now trying to appeal to more nominal people and thus they are less and less of them in these churches who are actually receiving the Holy Spirit. This group that is moving away from the baptism of the Holy Spirit represents between 60 to 80 percent of the movement. Thus, some are speculating that things could actually boil to a head that results in the minority calling for a spliting off.
Ah....the numbers game.Sad
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-21-2008, 09:47 PM
chosenbyone's Avatar
chosenbyone chosenbyone is offline
The LORD will fight for you


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 1,753
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes View Post
I am not talking about seeker rooms. Of course everything must be done in order. What I am talking about is a friend of mine has a cousin who is one of staff at a big AG church in St Louis. He said that if someone wants to receive the Holy Ghost even during the altar call. Well then they take them to the seeker room or the prayer room.
Lakewood Church has practiced this since the church was started. Of course, if you are having trouble speaking in tongues, they have staff members ready to help you formulate your "heavenly language".

I am sure that there are many Lakewood members who have the real Holy Ghost...it's just a shame that there are people in that church that confuse the seeker by instructing them to speak in tongues.
__________________


Isaiah 53:5: "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed."(KJV)

"God sends no one away empty except those who are full of themselves." Dwight L. Moody
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-21-2008, 10:07 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by cneasttx View Post
Oh gotcha. I was thinking about tongues and interpretation. The "seeker" rooms are for those wanting to receive the Holy Ghost.
And I think the Corinthians were all coming together to "get a good ole fashioned dose of the Holy Ghost" They should have had a "seeker room" for those who praying in tongues. (I would include those wanting to speak in tongues - since those praying with them often utter in tongues)
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-21-2008, 10:12 PM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
And I think the Corinthians were all coming together to "get a good ole fashioned dose of the Holy Ghost" They should have had a "seeker room" for those who praying in tongues. (I would include those wanting to speak in tongues - since those praying with them often utter in tongues)
Yes amen.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 05-21-2008, 11:14 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Really...??? I don't think they are eliminating this as a belief, Steve. Just whether or not it is the initial evidence ... it is still being practiced and encouraged (?). Pentocostalism is leading Christianity in growth numbers ... and the AG still remains the largest Pentecostal org ... dwarfing any Oneness org in size, resources and growth.
I read an article by an AG professor he said the majority of the AG have NOT spoken in tongues. This is NOT the denomination of Bell, Flowers, Pinson and company. They were persecuted for preaching HGB with tongues this was the reason for their formation. They were the finished work group that preached HGB with tongues.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 05-21-2008, 11:31 PM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
I read an article by an AG professor he said the majority of the AG have NOT spoken in tongues. This is NOT the denomination of Bell, Flowers, Pinson and company. They were persecuted for preaching HGB with tongues this was the reason for their formation. They were the finished work group that preached HGB with tongues.
This is sad. I am going to pray for them and us concerning this issue.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 05-21-2008, 11:43 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Some who left the UPC are heading the same direction Sabin for one. Pianoman said the HGB is rarely mentioned at Christ Church. The shift seemingly never stops.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 05-22-2008, 12:15 AM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Steve, maybe i missed it but I have been anxious for an update on you and your ministry.

If the info is not public then forget I asked of course.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-22-2008, 12:19 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Re: AGs will debate Tongues at the next GC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
Steve, maybe i missed it but I have been anxious for an update on you and your ministry.

If the info is not public then forget I asked of course.
I have been in revival in Nederland, Tx. for the last 7 weeks it closed tonight. I am going to Highland, Tx. beginning Sunday night. The Lord has blessed us we are scheduled through February.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why do I have to speak in tongues? Kutless Deep Waters 138 12-13-2009 07:18 PM
Warring tongues?? seguidordejesus Fellowship Hall 32 12-26-2007 07:12 PM
Discerning tongues Timmy Deep Waters 26 06-06-2007 09:52 AM
Is there a difference in Tongues? jillian Fellowship Hall 2 06-03-2007 07:31 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Praxeas

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.