You Be The Judge: Afp1996 vs Jason - Page 54

TK Burk · #**531** 06-05-2009, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

That is how he operates when a person answers him he ignores it and keeps on saying he wasn't answered even when he is posting the answer. Old trick but boring. He will not answer you because he cannot answer you.

Eld. Epley, I told you, and everyone else on this forum, that I would never mention AFP again if you would show where you proved "GENERATION" in Matthew 24:34 means "RACE." That is what YOU claimed. Now, prove you are an honest man, show us where you ever did that.

I am so very tired of your dog an pony junk. You have NEVER proven any of your eschatology claims. Now, be honest and show us all where you have already proven "RACE" is found in Matthew 24:34.

Dear readers, watch Eld. Epley squirm out of this, just like he always does....

TK Burk · #**532** 06-05-2009, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

Bro Epley,

I guess I am a liar, despite telling to the truth in all I have said in this forum. Odd, huh? Meanwhile, people accuse you of not answering them and they are not answering anyone, themselves.

Bro. Blume, you keep ignoring the fact that YOU said the following:

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfblume

Like I said, I am out of the situation, bro.

I have placed the two other B's on ignore for weeks now and cannot read their posts. So critique of my posts by them will be missed, since I am not reading their posts.

The IGNORE function blocks out their posts so that I cannot read them. It has proved useless for me to speak to them.

Bro. Blume you are the one who is now saying that you did not tell the truth in your above post...YOU SAID THAT, not me. I am only pointing out what YOU SAID. Of course anyone reading your posts during that time knew you were not telling the truth since you were still answering our posts.

So, Bro. Blume, when a guy says he is "not reading their posts," and has not "for weeks now," and "cannot read their posts," and then later admits that he was in fact reading those posts, what would you call it?? Would you say the guy was telling the truth? Or would you say the guy was not telling the truth? Surely you can see how you were not being truthful....

Bro. Blume, it is okay to admit the truth about this. Anyone reading your responses during that time easily saw that you were reading our posts, even though you kept claiming that you were not. That is why I kept asking how you were answering us in such detail while still saying that your were not reading our posts. Of course you never answered me because you were supposedly unable to read my posts. It is only now--several weeks after the fact--that you admit to have been doing exactly the opposite of what you claimed. So, if you did not do then what you claimed you were doing, how can anyone believe you went back and read every post we made like you're claiming now? See, this is why it is important to be known for being a honest man....

TK Burk · #**533** 06-05-2009, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason

Well that, and completly side stepping the questions.
What's new?

Jason, so you finally answered Bro. Benincasa's questions? Funny, I must have missed that....

TK Burk · #**534** 06-05-2009, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by afp1996

He must have learned it from you then....huh?

Talk about the odd couple. One believes the other's holiness standards is the "spirit of the Antichrist," and the other cannot answer a question given him unless he has someone else answer it for him. Weird, huh?

Timmy · #**535** 06-05-2009, 09:34 AM

Timmy · #**536** 06-05-2009, 09:35 AM

(Slightly less disrespectful than

, maybe?

)

TK Burk · #**537** 06-05-2009, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy

(Slightly less disrespectful than

, maybe?

)

Actually, it's not so much the simile, it’s the interrupting just for interruptions sake.

Timmy · #**538** 06-05-2009, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Actually, it's not so much the simile, it’s the interrupting just for interruptions sake.

Oooh, ya got me!

OK, seriously, I'll just step away. Slowly.

TK Burk · #**539** 06-05-2009, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy

Oooh, ya got me!

OK, seriously, I'll just step away. Slowly.

Okay, I'll get the toaster away from the tub now...

Esther · #**540** 06-05-2009, 10:21 AM

After reading the last several pages and learning NOTHING about the topic of debate it makes me want to say:

Put up or shut up! Seems the problem stated from both sides is their questons are not being answered. Either answer them plainly or move on. Others get tired of reading your squabbles.

I don't have time to read through a long thread to find nothing of value to read.

You all are intelligent enough to give your facts and leave the character abuse alone.

Thanks