Why the Rash of "Let's Taste Blood" Threads? - Page 5

StillStanding · #41 11-20-2007, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philjones

Sorry to disappoint you and AG, but it appears that neither can most of you!

Please explain! Who is "most of you"?

rgcraig · #42 11-20-2007, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoman

Please explain! Who is "most of you"?

OOOhhhh, is this a start of a rash?

#43 11-20-2007, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoman

Please explain! Who is "most of you"?

Go read my edited post.. that will tell you.

Ferd · #44 11-20-2007, 11:15 AM

Sometimes the message and the messenger are one and the same.

I call this carnality.

#45 11-20-2007, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

OOOhhhh, is this a start of a rash?

No ma'am! It is the calamine lotion of good advice!

mizpeh · #46 11-20-2007, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoman

I think some got questioning a message mixed up with attacking a preacher! They can't separate the message from the messenger.

Do you think the message was from the messenger or God? If the message was from the mind of the messanger then there is no separation.

#47 11-20-2007, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

Sometimes the message and the messenger are one and the same.

I call this carnality.

I will leave that to you most holy ones to judge. I am inadequately equipped to make such a judgment.

#48 11-20-2007, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

Do you think the message was from the messenger or God? If the message was from the mind of the messanger then there is no separation.

What you think about the source of any message and a dollar won't even get you a RT.44 at Sonic.

rgcraig · #49 11-20-2007, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

Do you think the message was from the messenger or God? If the message was from the mind of the messanger then there is no separation.

He did mention that it was a 15 year old sermon.

StillStanding · #50 11-20-2007, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philjones

Sorry to disappoint you and AG, but it appears that neither can most of you! Obviously it is not YOUR peapatch he is protecting so why are you so concerned about his methods or his message? You are not personally affected in any way! So I encourage you to quite assigning motives and hidden meaning to his forthright and frank message to the assembly God called him to pastor!

Your talking to the wrong poster, dude! I never assigned motives or hidden motives to his message.

I did make mention of THE WIFE THE WIFE THE WIFE! comment in his message.

I said that he was probably a good man just preaching his convictions like I've heard many times over in my lifetime.