Opinions & AS Discussion - Kilgore - Page 5

BoredOutOfMyMind · #41 07-27-2007, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NLYP

Dean. NOBODY on here has given This great man ANYTHING but honor.
Appears to me you want to just make an issue of this. I find it funny you change the name of the thread. I Praised him and then gave what I know to be factual. Bro. Strange, who has known the man most of his life backs up what I say and continues to give the great man honor, and rightly so. BUT funny you target me in the thread title.

No, O Contrare one-

The thread was forked.

I agree that you took a great tribute and instead turned into more sour grapes.

Dimples · #42 07-27-2007, 10:02 AM

There seems to be another thread honoring him only.

#43 07-27-2007, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

For the record........

What was discussed in regard to the AS was not meant in any way shape or forum as disrespect to Bro. Kilgore. It's very obvious that everyone taking part in the discussion loves and respects Bro. K highly.

You need to learn to read comprehensively maybe. Honour was paid to Bro. Kilgore and he will always be honoured and respected and loved, but that doesn't mean history will be ignored either.

Apparently the admins thought it was bad enough of a derailment to split off the two threads. It was rude that people derailed the conversation to say the least, but that seems to happen around here more often than not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NLYP

Dean. NOBODY on here has given This great man ANYTHING but honor.
Appears to me you want to just make an issue of this. I find it funny you change the name of the thread. I Praised him and then gave what I know to be factual. Bro. Strange, who has known the man most of his life backs up what I say and continues to give the great man honor, and rightly so. BUT funny you target me in the thread title.

It seems to be a pattern with your postings to try and turn many threads on this forum into discussions about the AS. If you didn't want to have your comments spotlighted and the title of the thread changed to reflect the content of it, maybe you should have started another thread and not derailed the first one which was intended to bring honor to a respected minister. The admins just split off the two threads due to the direction it took. Looked like a wise decision to me as the thread was going down the tubes quickly. Some people would like to be able to know what a thread is about by the titles. The title on this one seems to be pretty accurate to me.

NLYP · #44 07-27-2007, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dean

Wonderful. A thread started to honor one of the greatest among us almost turned into another Affirmation Statement debate.

The man deserves honor and it's humorous to me that even honoring a well deserving Elder can be tarnished if we're not careful. The man deserves honor. Period.

Furthermore.....YOU started this in your opening post...with this statement...

I can't question the man's character but I do wish I knew what was in the Bishop's mind. His kind simply can't be replaced.

Thats a question....YOU asked....so some of us gave our opinion. Please dont turn this around and make it look like Me or anybody else was trying to change your thread. You asked ...we answered.

It did a huge toll on him to have to mess with all the chain letters from PP a few years back. He is one of the greatest, he is THE humblest man I know, he is a prayer leader and a ministerial mentor. BUT he is also tired of the direction we are going politically. That would make me want to focus on another country as well where its about souls and not political agendas.

NLYP · #45 07-27-2007, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forgiven

Apparently the admins thought it was bad enough of a derailment to split off the two threads. It was rude that people derailed the conversation to say the least, but that seems to happen around here more often than not.

It seems to be a pattern with your postings to try and turn many threads on this forum into discussions about the AS. If you didn't want to have your comments spotlighted and the title of the thread changed to reflect the content of it, maybe you should have started another thread and not derailed the first one which was intended to bring honor to a respected minister. The admins just split off the two threads due to the direction it took. Looked like a wise decision to me as the thread was going down the tubes quickly. Some people would like to be able to know what a thread is about by the titles. The title on this one seems to be pretty accurate to me.

You are CLUELESS!!!!!
Or very uninformed.....I don not turn discussions into AS talk. It has been MONTHS since I have ever even seen a AS discussion. Give me a break.

rgcraig · #46 07-27-2007, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NLYP

Furthermore.....YOU started this in your opening post...with this statement...

I can't question the man's character but I do wish I knew what was in the Bishop's mind. His kind simply can't be replaced.

Thats a question....YOU asked....so some of us gave our opinion. Please dont turn this around and make it look like Me or anybody else was trying to change your thread. You asked ...we answered.

It did a huge toll on him to have to mess with all the chain letters from PP a few years back. He is one of the greatest, he is THE humblest man I know, he is a prayer leader and a ministerial mentor. BUT he is also tired of the direction we are going politically. That would make me want to focus on another country as well where its about souls and not political agendas.

Dan.....calm down a bit.

What you highlighted is about wishing he knew what was in the Bishop's mind about not speaking at engagements anymore. Read things in context.

Amos · #47 07-27-2007, 10:06 AM

Maybe someone could comment on his feelings about Life tabernacle's current direction under Jimbo's leadership...

Felicity · #48 07-27-2007, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forgiven

Apparently the admins thought it was bad enough of a derailment to split off the two threads. It was rude that people derailed the conversation to say the least, but that seems to happen around here more often than not.

Oh for goodness sake. Lighten up!

NLYP · #49 07-27-2007, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind

No, O Contrare one-

The thread was forked.

I agree that you took a great tribute and instead turned into more sour grapes.

You know you really confuse me sometimes.....

NLYP · #50 07-27-2007, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

For the record........

What was discussed in regard to the AS was not meant in any way shape or forum as disrespect to Bro. Kilgore. It's very obvious that everyone taking part in the discussion loves and respects Bro. K highly.

You need to learn to read comprehensively maybe. Honour was paid to Bro. Kilgore and he will always be honoured and respected and loved, but that doesn't mean history will be ignored either.

Thank You Felicity...