WOW!!! T F Tenney - "Let the Redeemed of the Lord DRESS SO" - Page 5

NLYP · #41 06-30-2007, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Define "funny."

Rev's attempt at humor...

NLYP · #42 06-30-2007, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IAintMovin

Good Ol' Half The Facts NLYP...............I do not walk out on TFT at BOTT.......he is usually on Thursday Morning and I never go on Thursday Morning...........I sleep in or Mrs IAM and I do somthing different on Thursday Morning...........and miss all three services.......Now lets see........who was with me on my "boycott" this year........now who was it............OH YEAH now I remember.............DQ and her husband........... Good Ol' Half The Facts Dan.......new nickname for NLYP

Yeah and one of my friends thinks that NO MATTER WHAT THE MAN SAYS it is right.............takes his word over the Word of God

Whatevah...................

I will now await my phone call............ ROFL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

And your phone did not ring!!!!
YOU said.....and I quote "I aint hearing ole "nasal Tenney"...lets go shopping"

So my friend.......Are you telling me that thursday is your day off no matter who is preaching??

Whatevah back at you

crakjak · #43 06-30-2007, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CC1

When you try to justify the legalism you are left with picking and choosing and twisting scripture.

Actually, with what seems like such a close relationship with Tommy, I cannot imagine him holding the view he presented in that sermon. If it is in fact four or five years ago maybe he has soften since then. Toward the end of his sermon he seemed to be saying, "If you don't agree with these things, I'm not saying they are salvational, so no need to leave, and go the church down the road." So, maybe he was already into flux, inspite of what NLYP says.

Newman · #44 06-30-2007, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak

Actually, with what seems like such a close relationship with Tommy, I cannot imagine him holding the view he presented in that sermon. If it is in fact four or five years ago maybe he has soften since then. Toward the end of his sermon he seemed to be saying, "If you don't agree with these things, I'm not saying they are salvational, so no need to leave, and go the church down the road." So, maybe he was already into flux, inspite of what NLYP says.

Except that it appears a CD with a 2005 copyright and same title is being marketed at PPH.... "Let the Redeemed of the Lord Dress So."

"Let the reedemed of the Lord say so" is found at Psalm 107:2.

crakjak · #45 06-30-2007, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Newman

Except that it appears a CD with a 2005 copyright and same title is being marketed at PPH.... "Let the Redeemed of the Lord Dress So."

"Let the reedemed of the Lord say so" is found at Psalm 107:2.

That is too bad, I don't think it dignifies the man at all.

Arphaxad · #46 06-30-2007, 11:21 PM

I like when he said holiness standards are like guardrails on a highway.

ARPH

sola gratia · #47 06-30-2007, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arphaxad

I like when he said holiness standards are like guardrails on a highway.

ARPH

This statement is probably one of the dumbest statements ever uttered over a pulpit! Guardrails - really.. Gee I thought the bible said follow after the spirit and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh. Guess I was wrong bout that... as well as Paul... it should have read follow the dress code and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh...

The Pharisees thought the extra rules they had created where guardrails... but instead they where stumbling stones to real relationship... strange similarities here.... actually frightening similarities

Trouvere · #48 06-30-2007, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sola gratia

This statement is probably one of the dumbest statements ever uttered over a pulpit! Guardrails - really.. Gee I thought the bible said follow after the spirit and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh. Guess I was wrong bout that... as well as Paul... it should have read follow the dress code and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh...

The Pharisees thought the extra rules they had created where guardrails... but instead they where stumbling stones to real relationship... strange similarities here.... actually frightening similarities

Pulpit envy or what? I did not see your name listed on the ministers speaking at Bogalusa??? Hum...maybe some of us like hearing his dumb statements.I may not agree 100% of the time
but the disrespect is sad coming from a christian.

Arphaxad · #49 07-01-2007, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sola gratia

This statement is probably one of the dumbest statements ever uttered over a pulpit! Guardrails - really.. Gee I thought the bible said follow after the spirit and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh. Guess I was wrong bout that... as well as Paul... it should have read follow the dress code and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh...

The Pharisees thought the extra rules they had created where guardrails... but instead they where stumbling stones to real relationship... strange similarities here.... actually frightening similarities

Holiness standards have never been a stumbling block to my relationship with Jesus. And they are not all about dress codes.

ARPH

sola gratia · #50 07-01-2007, 12:20 AM

okay - well - I think the statement is damaging to Christian faith. Damaging to true faith and trust in the Holy Ghost. Possibly ... well never mind.

I could care less to what degree someone ministry is successful. That in no way validates their message... if it does we should all be tuning into Joel Osteen, every night... I don't see any apostolic preaching to those kinds of crowds! Yet they rip into their teachings --- I wonder is that disrespect as well?

I respect the man, but disrespect the statement. If I conveyed otherwise it was unintentional