Quote:
Originally Posted by TRFrance
Pardon me folks. Somebody help me here.
It seems that so many people who always believed Barry Bonds was guilty
...and always believed Michael Vick was guilty
... and always believed Marion Jones was guilty
... now think "we should give Roger Clemens the benefit of the doubt" (?!)
Why is that?
...
|
Real easy...
1. No significant change in physical appearance after alleged use of substances
2. No significant change in performance after alleged use of substances
3. No written documentation of the alleged substance abuse which existed in the other cases referenced
4. Continued superior performance long after the alleged use of substances
I would say in a war of their word, I would believe The Rocket over this creep McNamee any day!