Was DA uncivil? Was he disruptive? I've personally had heated arguments with certain posters, even with "all caps", but at the end of the day we were all civil including our brother Dan.
This just seems more of the same double talk. Selective marginalizing.
Your use of vocabulary reminds me of Dan, and that's not an attempt to "selectively marginalize" you.
I spoke with Dan and told him how he has a loyal following that have nominated him for Sainthood after his AFF martyrdom.........
__________________
Psa 119:165 (KJV) 165 Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.
"Do not believe everthing you read on the internet" - Abe Lincoln
Was DA uncivil? Was he disruptive? I've personally had heated arguments with certain posters, even with "all caps", but at the end of the day we were all civil including our brother Dan.
This just seems more of the same double talk. Selective marginalizing.
I've not pointed at any particular individual as being disruptive or uncivil. I basically said that our goal was to be civil and that those things are not beneficial to a forum where the goal is dialogue and fellowship.
I do find your accusation that I'm using 'double talk' and 'selective marginalizing' way out of line, however. I'm being honest and trying, as an owner, to answer questions in a forthright manner. Perhaps you're just more infatuated with a personality than interested in real answers.
Its like telling a child to quit playing close to the water then trying to hold back the laughter when he falls in.
__________________ You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree
In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter
Was DA uncivil? Was he disruptive? I've personally had heated arguments with certain posters, even with "all caps", but at the end of the day we were all civil including our brother Dan.
This just seems more of the same double talk. Selective marginalizing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dean
I've not pointed at any particular individual as being disruptive or uncivil. I basically said that our goal was to be civil and that those things are not beneficial to a forum where the goal is dialogue and fellowship.
I do find your accusation that I'm using 'double talk' and 'selective marginalizing' way out of line, however. I'm being honest and trying, as an owner, to answer questions in a forthright manner. Perhaps you're just more infatuated with a personality than interested in real answers.
Unfortunately, I can't do anything about that.
Leave it to me to respond to a person who has already been banned.
Oooookay, I've been on the forums for 5 years now-from FCF on.
everyone can draw their own conslusions - i bow out of this one now I've stated my case and will leave it at that
Thaddie...
You may be out of sight, but you are not far. You may be out of mind, but not much. Almost omnipresent...but very entertaining. Try to not get yourself banned until after Tulsa, we are going to need to hear from the grapevine.
This thread is getting to be very entertaining and I find a lot of fellowship in it too. Laughed my head off when Staysharp got banned. That was sooooo easily done. Now he is going to have to endure the withdrawl pains...LOL.....
Linear Mode
