For those who want to know...RULES at my church!

Originally Posted by Theresa

STS, was your church, or is that church, UPC?

Yes it is UPC or least it was...they did change the name...I think because there was a man that was in our town, that started posting flyers everywhere and going door to door telling everyone what a bad church it was. The pastor said publically it didn't bother him, but they did change the name...

[LadyRev]

Originally Posted by SISTER Murphy

Yes, it was 'peaceful and sweet' because there was no dissenting point of view, just like minded feelings. Set your mind at ease, dear, my husband has said that my time on this thread has come to an end, so you may now continue on your merry way without a worry of my disturbance.

Wheres that barfing smiley?

Ah here it is...

[Theresa]

Originally Posted by SISTER Murphy

Yes, it was 'peaceful and sweet' because there was no dissenting point of view, just like minded feelings. Set your mind at ease, dear, my husband has said that my time on this thread has come to an end, so you may now continue on your merry way without a worry of my disturbance.

<Shakes head>

nope, I wont say it..I wont go there...

you cant make me



but I'm SURE I'm not alone....

[Theresa]

Originally Posted by LadyRev

Wheres that barfing smiley?

Ah here it is...

GET OUT OF MY HEAD

[LadyRev]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Thad, it's probably best she just move on.

I have to disagree with you on this one.

I'm glad she got out but there are others to be considered that need to get out and/or be protected from this junk.

[Thad]

Originally Posted by LadyRev

I have to disagree with you on this one.

I'm glad she got out but there are others to be considered that need to get out and/or be protected from this junk.

Renda may have a point about there being too long of time lapse or that there may not be enough proof.

she may be able to get some other former members to help her with this too as far as testimony goes


Otherwise, I too think renda is wrong if she thinks she ought to just drop it as if it never happens which is what renda seems to advocate

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Thad

Renda may have a point about there being too long of time lapse or that there may not be enough proof.

she may be able to get some other former members to help her with this too as far as testimony goes


Otherwise, I too think renda is wrong if she thinks she ought to just drop it as if it never happens which is what renda seems to advocate

If it happened last week, YES SHE SHOULD - - I'm just afraid it's too late and she will just have to move on.

[Theresa]

Originally Posted by Thad

Renda may have a point about there being too long of time lapse or that there may not be enough proof.

she may be able to get some other former members to help her with this too as far as testimony goes


Otherwise, I too think renda is wrong if she thinks she ought to just drop it as if it never happens which is what renda seems to advocate

if you cant get anything done legally, you can always out this mess in the media.

someone can tip somebody off and they can "visit" and see what they think for themselves. Might take several visits, but you'll get a sense something is off pretty quick

[rgcraig]

Before we continue on - - why don't we get a timeframe reference.

[Thad]

Originally Posted by LadyRev

Wheres that barfing smiley?

Ah here it is...

Why? what in that post made you feel that way- i read it 3x and still wondering. because she claimed her husband was telling her to pull away from this thread ?