Voter Fraud?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

This was a hearing in TX. The man is a TX STATE rep. I find it highly unlikely that this state rep would know about the inner workings of the SCOTUS.

I find it highly unlikely that you would personally know more than a state Rep.

[Pressing-On]

This report by Peter Navarro is a supplement prior to the DNI report.

“This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states.”

THE IMMACULATE DECEPTION:
Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities
The Navarro Report

https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-conten...12.15.20-1.pdf

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I find it highly unlikely that you would personally know more than a state Rep.

Well, the state rep admitted he doesn't remember where he read it, so there's that.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Well, the state rep admitted he doesn't remember where he read it, so there's that.

Pretty bold of him to get up and straight up lie like that, don’t ya think? He said, “I wish I could give you a specific citation for this, but I didn’t make a note of it because it was something that I read this morning.”


I read a lot of stuff throughout the day. If I don’t save it, I will invariably forget where I saw the info and can’t cite it either.

That isn’t a big deal, unless you need to win an argument.

I can send him the link. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index...rt-intimidated

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Pretty bold of him to get up and straight up lie like that, don’t ya think? He said, “I wish I could give you a specific citation for this, but I didn’t make a note of it because it was something that I read this morning.”

I read a lot of stuff throughout the day. If I don’t save it, I will invariably forget where I saw the info and can’t cite it either.

That isn’t a big deal, unless you need to win an argument.

I can send him the link. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index...rt-intimidated

I didn't say he lied. I said he was irresponsible for believing something he read without confirming it. There's a difference!

Comparing what you read throughout the day to something as major as this is lame and won't work with me. You can try it with someone else, but I'm not buying what you're trying to sell.

It IS a big deal. Knowing the source is a MAJOR deal, especially with the accusations he's making. Sources matter and should be known.

As to the link you provided from Hal Turner. Who is Hal Turner? Hal, the guy who claimed to be BFFs with Sean Hannity. Except it turns out the timeframe of his claims didn't match with Hannity's radio show and the connection was disputed by Hannity and his show's producer. Is it Hal, the guy who was an FBI informant and claims he spent time in the same cell as McVeigh and ate with terrorists.

Yeah, I'm going to believe Hal Turner got an unsolicited email from a clerk at the SCOTUS who spilled the beans on some alleged meeting the Justices had (even though they haven't been meeting since COVID).

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

I didn't say he lied. I said he was irresponsible for believing something he read without confirming it. There's a difference!

Comparing what you read throughout the day to something as major as this is lame and won't work with me. You can try it with someone else, but I'm not buying what you're trying to sell.

It IS a big deal. Knowing the source is a MAJOR deal, especially with the accusations he's making. Sources matter and should be known.

As to the link you provided from Hal Turner. Who is Hal Turner? Hal, the guy who claimed to be BFFs with Sean Hannity. Except it turns out the timeframe of his claims didn't match with Hannity's radio show and the connection was disputed by Hannity and his show's producer. Is it Hal, the guy who was an FBI informant and claims he spent time in the same cell as McVeigh and ate with terrorists.

Yeah, I'm going to believe Hal Turner got an unsolicited email from a clerk at the SCOTUS who spilled the beans on some alleged meeting the Justices had (even though they haven't been meeting since COVID).

Pretty sure that Hal Turner got his info from Big League Politics who say that they “have reported on Roberts’ long legacy of betrayal for conservatives, as the chief justice has worked to rubberstamp unconstitutional measures at the behest of leftists”. Possibly this was the original link. I am not sure.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/report...tifa-pushback/

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Pretty sure that Hal Turner got his info from Big League Politics who say that they “have reported on Roberts’ long legacy of betrayal for conservatives, as the chief justice has worked to rubberstamp unconstitutional measures at the behest of leftists”. Possibly this was the original link. I am not sure.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/report...tifa-pushback/

The link for Hal's show you posted above had this line: ""Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS."

That makes Hal a source, if not THE source, for the State Rep's claim. And if Hal's the source, I'm certainly questioning the validity of the claims considering Hal's background of embellishments.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

The link for Hal's show you posted above had this line: ""Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS."

That makes Hal a source, if not THE source, for the State Rep's claim. And if Hal's the source, I'm certainly questioning the validity of the claims considering Hal's background of embellishments.

There seems to be either a connection or confusion between a phone call Roberts had dissing Trump and this report by Turner. Waiting for clarification. With how Roberts has been ruling on the Supreme Court, I wouldn’t put anything past him. Maybe when he fell and was hospitalized in June, it affected him more. Lol! Ugh! What a hack and disappointment.

[Esaias]

Hal Turner is a known admitted FBI informant-provacateur. Came out several years ago.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Hal Turner is a known admitted FBI informant-provacateur. Came out several years ago.

Yes, I see you got the info from Wikipedia. A lot there that I don’t want to spend time on, but it makes you wonder if the FBI turned against him. I have never heard of him. Doing some digging, the info was on 4chan as well. Being the person he is, I would wonder if he wasn’t trying to get a rise out of the Supremes or media.

I was telling the people in my group text, over a week ago, that I felt these cases may not go anywhere because people are frightened for their lives and they are afraid of the massive rioting that would occur if ruling in Trumps’s favor.

That makes it not hard to image the courts wanting to walk away.

My next thought is where did the Dallas Rep, initially, get the clip he is referencing? I would be interested to know that. I couldn’t imagine he got it from directly from Turner.