Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #441  
Old 12-28-2010, 10:46 AM
Mr. Smith's Avatar
Mr. Smith Mr. Smith is offline
Best Hair on AFF


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,254
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie View Post
Don't make statements about what I've listened to or not. You don't know a thing about me in this regard.
I've been very active in the prolife community. I know what it's like to get my hands "dirty" as you put it.

I surely hope this woman you would hold hands with hasn't claimed the Name of Jesus and given her life to the Lord.

But, you still didn't answer my question. Would you attend a robbery and hold their hand thru it?
And please don't go to the point that it's illegal to steal, it's also illegal to murder one's child, in the eyes of God.

I can only answer the question you asked, so no, I wouldn't hold someone's hand while they committed a robbery. I'd get arrested.

If I don't know about you, then tell me about you. Have you sat with a girl in the aftermath of her abortion?
Reply With Quote
  #442  
Old 12-28-2010, 10:49 AM
sandie sandie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII View Post
Jesus accompanies the preacher sleeping in the Motel 6 with his secretary ...

sometimes even anointing the preacher to speak in other tongues the following Sunday ...

Bad, Jesus.
I guess Paul was bad.

1 Corinthians 5:1-13
Reply With Quote
  #443  
Old 12-28-2010, 10:55 AM
sandie sandie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,685
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Smith View Post
I can only answer the question you asked, so no, I wouldn't hold someone's hand while they committed a robbery. I'd get arrested.
What makes that sin not worthy of your company? You're not willing to really put yourself on the line then, since you would get arrested?

Quote:
If I don't know about you, then tell me about you. Have you sat with a girl in the aftermath of her abortion?
I'm not going to go into details, I learned the hard way what can happen when too much info is given out on the web.
I've been involved in the prolife community a long time. It's so intense, so traumatic dealing with the deaths of not only the children, but the mothers as well that I've taken a year off. I don't know when I'll be getting my "hands dirty" again.

Today nearly 4,000 children will die gruesome deaths. Just know that.
Reply With Quote
  #444  
Old 12-28-2010, 10:56 AM
DAII DAII is offline
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie View Post
I guess Paul was bad.

1 Corinthians 5:1-13
Surely Jesus is worse.
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
Reply With Quote
  #445  
Old 12-28-2010, 11:04 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

For Mr. Smith, in the marriage you attended of a homosexual couple, was God mentioned?
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #446  
Old 12-28-2010, 11:43 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truthseeker View Post
Would you attend a wedding of a couple founded off adultery? If they both were married before had an affair then divorced to marry each other?
As far as I know, the first time Jesus told someone that He was the Christ, was in John chapter 4. To whom did He make this statement? A woman who had been married 5 times and who was currently living with a man to whom she was not married.

He took the time to talk to her and before the conversation was over she was converted. She ran into town and because of her testimony many believed.

There are several things that can be seen here.
Just a couple of them are:
-Jesus did not tell her she had 5 current husbands but spoke of them in the past tense. This would agree with Deuteronomy 24:1-4 where it speaks of a divorced husband being a "former husband" or we would use the term "ex" for ex-husband.
-just because she was living with a person did not make them married
-Jesus did not tell her she was on her way to hell for being divorced or for living with someone
-Jesus did not tell her to leave her current partner before she could testify to others
-Jesus uses women to carry His message
Reply With Quote
  #447  
Old 12-28-2010, 11:50 AM
Tim Rutledge's Avatar
Tim Rutledge Tim Rutledge is offline
Not wrestling w/ flesh n blood


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

There are a lot of "good" nice people who sin and live in sin. Only the blood of Jesus makes anyone righteous. And we daily fail and need His mercy. But.. People are not born homosexuals.. and therein is where the moral spiritual debate begins. If your of the opinion God makes an abomination in "creating" a person gay.. Your perspective will always be different then the person who believes otherwise. Only time and eternity will give us the answers. For the record I'd never knowingly take a shower with a queer and if one trys to hit on me.. he/she would be hit. This country is and has been headed in the wrong direction morally for years.. It'll only get worse allowing perverts to openly serve our great country.
__________________
There is a conspiracy of silence in the land.

The gloves are off.
Reply With Quote
  #448  
Old 12-28-2010, 12:19 PM
DAII DAII is offline
Freedom@apostolicidentity .com


 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,597
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Rutledge View Post
There are a lot of "good" nice people who sin and live in sin. Only the blood of Jesus makes anyone righteous. And we daily fail and need His mercy. But.. People are not born homosexuals.. and therein is where the moral spiritual debate begins. If your of the opinion God makes an abomination in "creating" a person gay.. Your perspective will always be different then the person who believes otherwise. Only time and eternity will give us the answers. For the record I'd never knowingly take a shower with a queer and if one trys to hit on me.. he/she would be hit. This country is and has been headed in the wrong direction morally for years.. It'll only get worse allowing perverts to openly serve our great country.
You forgot to finish this post with "in Jesus name".
__________________
VISIT US @ WWW.THE316.COM
Reply With Quote
  #449  
Old 12-28-2010, 01:33 PM
Jason B Jason B is offline
Saved by Grace


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Decatur, TX
Posts: 5,247
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

Now we know what it looks like when He does, but why does He do it? "he wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness." The wrath of God is already operating in our culture. And God has abandoned our society on a wide scale and let our society go the way it chooses to go without restraint. But God has abandoned our society because our society has first abandoned God. There is no surer and no sadder evidence of a corrupted, wicked abandoned society than when that society will not tolerate anger against sin. Our society won't tolerate anger against sin. Our society feeds on sin and wants no one to deny it its iniquities. And so, here we are under the wrath of God's abandonment. It isn't like it once was. Restraining grace has been pulled back and this society gets more immoral, more homosexual and more depraved every day. And why? The major reason is summed up in one statement. "We suppress the truth."
http://www.gty.org/Resources/Sermons...=homosexuality
__________________
"Resolved: That all men should live to the glory of God. Resolved, secondly: That whether or not anyone else does, I will." ~Jonathan Edwards

"The only man who has the right to say he is justified by grace alone is the man who has left all to follow Christ." ~Dietrich Bonheoffer, The Cost of Discipleship

"Preachers who should be fishing for men are now too often fishing for compliments from men." ~Leonard Ravenhill
Reply With Quote
  #450  
Old 12-28-2010, 02:17 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
Re: Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

sandie seriously? Comparing providing succor to a woman having an abortion to assisting in a felonious armed robbery?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DADT will still be enforced. coadie Political Talk 21 11-18-2010 05:38 PM
California AG urges court to repeal prop 8 Praxeas The Newsroom 4 12-20-2008 07:42 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Praxeas
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.