Voter Fraud?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Reminder: it isn't "voter fraud", it's ELECTION FRAUD.

My brother, I don't think they are getting it.

[Pressing-On]

Sidney Powell ����⭐⭐⭐
·
Dec 17, 2020
The #SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan but SLOW-walking w/ state response not due until JAN 14!
Today it FINALLY submitted our #Arizona & #Wisconsin EMERGENCY petitions filed Friday INEXPLICABLY rejected them


This doesn’t surprise me after 8/19 phone call has Justice Roberts on a phone call with Justice Breyer on how to work to get Trump voted out, saying, he will make sure the mf never gets elected.

[Scott Pitta]

I do not have a favorite political party.

I notice the action of the courts, not the talking points of the news or social media.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

I do not have a favorite political party.

I notice the action of the courts, not the talking points of the news or social media.

Yes Scott, you are totally objective.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

I do not have a favorite political party.

I notice the action of the courts, not the talking points of the news or social media.

You obviously weren’t really paying attention as the cases were thrown out on petty technicalities and not on the merits of fraud being found. They wouldn’t even listen to the evidence!

If you are paying attention to the courts, pay attention to this moral cowardice.

Did Chief Justice John Roberts Really Scream at Conservative Justices Over the Texas Challenge to the 2020 Elections
https://redstate.com/streiff/2020/12...ctions-n296273

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

You obviously weren’t really paying attention as the cases were thrown out on petty technicalities and not on the merits of fraud being found. They wouldn’t even listen to the evidence!

If you are paying attention to the courts, pay attention to this moral cowardice.

Did Chief Justice John Roberts Really Scream at Conservative Justices Over the Texas Challenge to the 2020 Elections
https://redstate.com/streiff/2020/12...ctions-n296273

Good grief.

Don't worry you all will get the president you all so much deserve.

It might just be the Donald, it just might be.

[Evang.Benincasa]

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Did Chief Justice John Roberts Really Scream at Conservative Justices Over the Texas Challenge to the 2020 Elections
https://redstate.com/streiff/2020/12...ctions-n296273

When I first read about this I pointed out to.a friend that it was made up because the Justices haven’t been meeting together due to COVID.

From the link above:
“there is a huge factual error in the account related by Mr. Patrick. The Supreme Court justices have not met in person for a conference since March. So there is no closed room from which shouting could be heard. If someone were outside the doors of Roberts or any of the other liberal justices, they could have heard one person screaming. If they were outside the conservatives’ doors, they would not have heard anything unless one or more of those justices had a kick-ass sound system.”

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

When I first read about this I pointed out to.a friend that it was made up because the Justices haven’t been meeting together due to COVID.

From the link above:
“there is a huge factual error in the account related by Mr. Patrick. The Supreme Court justices have not met in person for a conference since March. So there is no closed room from which shouting could be heard. If someone were outside the doors of Roberts or any of the other liberal justices, they could have heard one person screaming. If they were outside the conservatives’ doors, they would not have heard anything unless one or more of those justices had a kick-ass sound system.”

The person reporting said the Court had met for this because they didn’t trust the telephonic meeting as secure.

The man testifying is on the State Republican Executive Committee. No one at the hearing disputed his account of events. So, hearing him and reading an article - you have to weigh which account is true.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The person reporting said the Court had met for this because they didn’t trust the telephonic meeting as secure.

The man testifying is on the State Republican Executive Committee. No one at the hearing disputed his account of events. So, hearing him and reading an article - you have to weigh which account is true.

This was a hearing in TX. The man is a TX STATE rep. I find it highly unlikely that this state rep would know about the inner workings of the SCOTUS.

The one place in DC that doesn't leak is the SCOTUS. All the major decisions that have come through the SCOTUS, not one has been leaked prior to release of the decision and there hasn't been any leak of the deliberations or debates between the SCOTUS Justices.

There's so much disinformation going around, I find it irresponsible for this state rep to believe what he read and repeat it in a hearing without confirming it was true.

Rep Patrick admitted “I wish I could give you a specific citation for this, but I didn’t make a note of it because it was something that I read this morning.”

Seriously?!? You just happened to have read something this damning and you didn't take the time to write down or don't remember where you read it. And how is it only this State Rep read this "report" and no other Republican has? I mean, use the brain God gave you and think about this. This is a major story, if true. So why is this guy the only one mentioning it?

I don't believe it. Too many inconsistencies and questions as to him being a sole witness to the "report."