Marriage Rejuvenation?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

What? No mention of God's law?

Yet, you use His law to claim you're in an actual marriage?

You're "marriage" isn't recognized by the State, so it isn't recognized by God.

And let's not forget, YOU said YOU are getting a CIVIL MARRIAGE now so the two of you can LEGALLY collect Social Security. So, all the anti-legal stuff is just smoke and mirrors to cover your in-the-buff Wheaties post.

I can tell you're not reading or paying attention. I told you her final thoughts on it. So, get your facts right, first.

[Sean]

You're "marriage" isn't recognized by the State, so it isn't recognized by God.

AKA..."when the state speaks, God speaks".

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Why didn't you do the same instead of a "Quaker" marriage?

Where does the Bible say someone married like a Quaker?

Um, that's where Quakers got their tradition. No officiant is mentioned in Scripture. Lol

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Sean

Yes, I answered it a few pages ago....

He doesn't read to understand. He reads to condemn.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Aquila

He doesn't read to understand. He reads to condemn.

It is a great subject on this thread.

It really shows me how proud folks can be of their state licenses.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Aquila

He doesn't read to understand. He reads to condemn.

And who has yet to aknowledge what God says about obeying civil laws and civil authorities? Not me.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Your "state sponsorship" is the license they gave you.

So, you agreed with my stance when you got married.

Now you're acting like a licensed marriage is wrong, even though you're living the exact same way.

That is what is called a hypocrite.

I'm not saying a licensed marriage is wrong. I'm saying that for many, it is against their religious convictions.

Is state marriage law in agreement with God's law concerning property, divorce, remarriage, going before unbelieving courts, and gay marriage?

No!

If that's fine with you to be contractually bound to that, it is your personal choice. And you agree to the cost of that choice.

It's not fine with us. And we don't agree to the terms of Caesar's contract.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Sean

Hey Aquila, he does not think the early, pre- white man, American Indians were legally married either.

Lol.

The marriage license was a racist innovation.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

And who has yet to aknowledge what God says about obeying civil laws and civil authorities? Not me.

What is the greater sin?

A...speeding?

B....being married without a state license?


You see it yet?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Lol.

The marriage license was a racist innovation.

Oh, you saw that too?

I almost said that.