((((NEWS FLASH)))) Vicki Y To Sing in 2 UPC churches!!!!!

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

No difference whatsoever EVERY woman wearing pants is an abomination.
God is not pleased with transvestites!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Then you would wear a pair of pants from the women's department? If not, why not?

THIS (CROSS dressing) is an abomination:



THIS (woman wearing pants) is not an abomination:

[Kansas Preacher]

Originally Posted by revrandy

Must be lonely on CAF today....

We are missing you.

[Whole Hearted]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

No difference whatsoever EVERY woman wearing pants is an abomination.
God is not pleased with transvestites!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AMEN

[Kansas Preacher]

Originally Posted by Subdued

Then you would wear a pair of pants from the women's department? If not, why not?

THIS (CROSS dressing) is an abomination:


THIS (woman wearing pants) is not an abomination:

Once again, since you obviously missed this post:

Originally Posted by Kansas Preacher

I think some of you need to go back and re-read Deuteronomy 22:5, paying close attention to the wording -- not what you WANT it to mean, but what it actually SAYS.

"The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God."

A man is strictly forbidden from wearing a garment which is MADE for a woman (hence, "women's pants"), but a woman is strictly forbidden from wearing a garment which "PERTAINS TO" (i.e., "To have reference; relate") a man. Thus, what SHE wears is not to even RESEMBLE a man's clothing. What HE wears is not to be MADE FOR her.

It's simple enough to me.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Kansas Preacher

Once again, since you obviously missed this post:

So would you allow your teenagers in your church to wear white shirts and men's ties?

[Kansas Preacher]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

So would you allow your teenagers in your church to wear white shirts and men's ties?

If they are BOYS, yes!

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by Kansas Preacher

Once again, since you obviously missed this post:

No, I didn't miss your post. Yes, I've read that scripture. Have you ever consulted the Strong's definitions for the words in this scripture?

Also, please explain why BOTH men AND women were wearing robes when that scripture was written.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Kansas Preacher

If they are BOYS, yes!

If they were teenage girls would you ask them not to?

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Subdued

No, I didn't miss your post. Yes, I've read that scripture. Have you ever consulted the Strong's definitions for the words in this scripture?

Also, please explain why BOTH men AND women were wearing robes when that scripture was written.

I've always hear the scripture was about military wear.

[Subdued]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

I've always hear the scripture was about military wear.

Hint: Look up the meaning in the Strong's concordance.