Why am I labeled backslid and unusable by God

[mrnbcox]

Originally Posted by jfrog

Sounds like advice on how to handle Ultracons to me

you and Paul wouldn't get along. He is too Ultra Con for you

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by mrnbcox

Rom 16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.

2Tim 4:3-4
3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Rom 16:17 - Should we apply this to you and yours?

What were these "fables" that these turned away to? Are we proof-texting again???

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by mrnbcox

you and Paul wouldn't get along. He is too Ultra Con for you

Care to comment on the remainder of this thread. Many questions pitched for you. You sort of just disappeared.

[mrnbcox]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Care to comment on the remainder of this thread. Many questions pitched for you. You sort of just disappeared.

I disappeared for several reasons.

1. Been busy with Church work

2. I answered his question in the original post.

3. I took heed to this scripture as the thread began to spiral
Titus 3:9
But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitiable and vain.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by mrnbcox

I disappeared for several reasons.

1. Been busy with Church work

2. I answered his question in the original post.

3. I took heed to this scripture as the thread began to spiral
Titus 3:9
But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitiable and vain.

You are a bit out of context with your Titus bomb. But that's cool. Nothing to respond to.

Ironically, Titus 3:9 should be read aloud before the speakers get up at some of the conferences you've been attending. Might be a good way to prevent "vain strivings about (their own) law."

[mrnbcox]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

You are a bit out of context with your Titus bomb. But that's cool. Nothing to respond to.

Ironically, Titus 3:9 should be read aloud before the speakers get up at some of the conferences you've been attending. Might be a good way to prevent "vain strivings about (their own) law."

In some places I'm inclined to agree. As much as this may surprise you, i'm not a fan of choking them with the law, but I do believe in obeying the law.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by mrnbcox

In some places I'm inclined to agree. As much as this may surprise you, i'm not a fan of choking them with the law, but I do believe in obeying the law.

What is the law? Obeying what law?

Did Paul contend that Gentiles are under the law?

[mrnbcox]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

What is the law? Obeying what law?

Did Paul contend that Gentiles are under the law?

I'm really not interested in debating it. We both know what the word says about the Law.

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by mrnbcox

I'm really not interested in debating it. We both know what the word says about the Law.

[RandyWayne]

Originally Posted by mrnbcox

I'm really not interested in debating it. We both know what the word says about the Law.

There are roughly two of them (laws that is -or at least they are distilled down to only two). And we should all know what they are......