Why Acts 2:38 Uses The Word “remission” - Page 41

rrford · #**401** 04-26-2007, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

May be??? Where do you see that ...???

In the translation you offered. Just using your words.

#**402** 04-26-2007, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Most Pentecostals/Charismatics as a whole believe in the PCI view. FACT.

Dan this is not PCI,UPCI or any other CIs this is just what the Bible says and it means what it says.

"Repent, and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins......"

SDG · #**403** 04-26-2007, 10:04 PM

may be ... is different from maybe.

rrford · #**404** 04-26-2007, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

may be ... is different from maybe.

Indeed it is. And that is exactly the point.

Steve Epley · #**405** 04-26-2007, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford

It really seems obvious to me. Repent, that your sins may be washed away. Without repentance the waters of baptism serve no purpose.

True. It is NOT either or but both neither can save without the other.

SDG · #**406** 04-26-2007, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Blacksher

Dan this is not PCI,UPCI or any other CIs this is just what the Bible says and it means what it says.

"Repent, and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins......"

You see ... this is where you get confused ... Gary ... Epley made an assertion that a group of 'experts' agree w/ the Pentecostals ... when it's deceptive to say the least.

#**407** 04-26-2007, 10:05 PM

HAHAHAHA! Just answer the question please. Yes or No.

Dan you believe that baptism in Jesus name is not a Biblical absolute doctrine,that must be adhered to?

warrior81680 · #**408** 04-26-2007, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Please don't ever use a translation in any .... of your sermons ... since you discount any other alternate translations provide in discussions here.

In light of the body of evidence that has already been presented to you, why do you continue to insist that YOUR translation is right and all others wrong?

And, if baptism should be practiced, why is it not absolute? Can you elucidate a little more?

SDG · #**409** 04-26-2007, 10:07 PM

it's like me saying .... eat this doughnut so that you may have dessert.

SDG · #**410** 04-26-2007, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrior81680

In light of the body of evidence that has already been presented to you, why do you continue to insist that YOUR translation is right and all others wrong?

And, if baptism should be practiced, why is it not absolute? Can you elucidate a little more?

Evidence ... I've smoked Epley once again.