Gay Marriage: For or Against?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by DAII

Goofy, can you please keep your eye on the ball? (Pun intended)

Humungo Strawman. I don't do rabbit trails, jefe.

No one expressed an affinity or fondness for gay websites ... I simply referenced a quote that mainly quoted GOD-BREATHED scripture related to the THE TOPIC AT HAND between you and I ... namely your fallacious interpretation of Genesis 6 and the cause of God's wrath towards Sodom and Gomorrah ... as illuminated to us through other biblical references.

and highlighting the fact that some GAY guy is able to interpret this passage more soundly than you can.

I have also expressed my belief that homosexuality, like all sexual immorality is wrong. That their assertion about a gay relationship between David and Jonathon is as FALLACIOUS as your view on the CAUSE for GOD"S WRATH ON SODOM AND GOMORRAH ... and the clear witness in Scripture that ALL SIN is ABHORRENT AND DETESTED BY A HOLY GOD ... as evident with Sodom.

I have no intent in defending all of their views as much as you don't support the conclusion that being gay is genetic as the study you sought to rely on earlier in the thread.

Is it that hard for you to stay focused? Or is your obsession with this topic a rouse for your inner monster?

Compartmentalize.

Big word alert. Do you know what a rouse is?

Synonyms: stir, revive, disturb, arouse, awaken, wake up
\
I counseled a youngster once. He said one of his parents was possessive aggressive. This is how you show me you do not know what you are talking about.

What is an inner monster?

Is it just an expression you use to prove you don't know what your are talking about?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by coadie

Big word alert. Do you know what a rouse is?

Synonyms: stir, revive, disturb, arouse, awaken, wake up
\
I counseled a youngster once. He said one of his parents was possessive aggressive. This is how you show me you do not know what you are talking about.

What is an inner monster?

Is it just an expression you use to prove you don't know what your are talking about?

You obviously are a poster of child for Attention Deficit Disorder.

You been sold a bag of goods and are trying to pass it off to an astute group of forum posters.

Caveat emptor.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by coadie

On Friday, the Washington Post's Ruth Marcus actually accused the former Alaska governor of being homophobic for calling reporters "limp" and "impotent."

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/#ixzz0yr0PTzZa

Part of the gay agenda is name calling. It is a way to pressure people to change their views I guess.

Do you think the comment was appropriate?

I have commented on how the pastor of the first church I attended used words like "f*g" and "f*gg*t". It was inappropriate. I don't want my son learning to talk about anyone like that. Sometimes things are just inappropriate. I'm sure that if there was a demonstration and he said, "Let's get these 'holy rollers' off these steps!", there would be outcry from the Christian community.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by coadie

We do not deny them freedom of religion. You seem to have a bad habit of making up strawmen.

Wrong Coadie... my uncle plainly said that he felt his freedom of religion squelched on this one. It's his religion's position that such unions are lawful. He desires to perform them. Do we tell him he can't do so based on our interpretation of Scripture? Is that not forcing our religious beliefs onto him?

http://whosoever.org/rainbowfish/

These are the gay churches that seem to have freedom. Ask DAII. he follows these folks for some reason.

Coadie... my uncle can't perform these unions throughout the United States. While I disagree with them... it is his religion's position that such unions are acceptable. What do we do... force our interpretation of the issue onto him? The Roman Catholic Church takes a position against remarriage. Do we force that one on all Americans? Most Protestants don't believe in remarriage unless the spouse was unfaithful or is dead... do we force this interpretation on all Americans?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Do you think the comment was appropriate?

I have commented on how the pastor of the first church I attended used words like "f*g" and "f*gg*t". It was inappropriate. I don't want my son learning to talk about anyone like that. Sometimes things are just inappropriate. I'm sure that if there was a demonstration and he said, "Let's get these 'holy rollers' off these steps!", there would be outcry from the Christian community.

So you say limp and impotent are euphemisms for gay?
The gay agenda is to be trigger happy in labeling people as homophobic. No one seems to be able to give examples of feas or phobias.

It is The Advocate, not Sarah Palin, who is guilty of "gay-baiting." I don't think most people associate the words "impotent," "limp," or "gutless" with being gay - I know I certainly don't. If the folks at The Advocate think these words are euphemisms for being gay or lesbian then I think that speaks volumes about their own internalized homophobia.

I personally find the names gays call each other offensive. Palin doesn't use their grotesque language. As a group gays hate her. As individuals, she has gay friends.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Wrong Coadie... my uncle plainly said that he felt his freedom of religion squelched on this one. It's his religion's position that such unions are lawful. He desires to perform them. Do we tell him he can't do so based on our interpretation of Scripture? Is that not forcing our religious beliefs onto him?



Coadie... my uncle can't perform these unions throughout the United States. While I disagree with them... it is his religion's position that such unions are acceptable. What do we do... force our interpretation of the issue onto him? The Roman Catholic Church takes a position against remarriage. Do we force that one on all Americans? Most Protestants don't believe in remarriage unless the spouse was unfaithful or is dead... do we force this interpretation on all Americans?

Why do you still insist on forcing your views?
DOMA is because the gay agenda wants to force it's views on people by finding single activist jusdges. The legislations don't seem to work as well.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by coadie

So you say limp and impotent are euphemisms for gay?
The gay agenda is to be trigger happy in labeling people as homophobic. No one seems to be able to give examples of feas or phobias.

All I asked is that if it was appropriate. Pay attention.

I personally find the names gays call each other offensive. Palin doesn't use their grotesque language. As a group gays hate her. As individuals, she has gay friends.

You totally missed my point.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by coadie

Why do you still insist on forcing your views?
DOMA is because the gay agenda wants to force it's views on people by finding single activist jusdges. The legislations don't seem to work as well.

What two private individuals do with their lives is their own personal business. I'm called to live a Christian life. And my church is called to aid Christians in living a Christian life. If anyone becomes a Christian, the church's standards apply to them. But free American citizens that are unChristian? They are free to drink, smoke, live together, marry who they desire, etc. REAL believers can be in the world and not of it.

Christianity is being reduced to a political position. We do better to have it be a personal approach to life that is a witness to a lost world... not a hot button political position. I think it does damage to the cross. I once witnessed to a man onboard an airplane. We had a great talk. I told him that he should visit an Apostolic Pentecostal church. He said, "Oh, no I couldn't do that." I said, "Why?" He said, "I'm not a political conservative, I'm not even Republican!" So here's a soul equating the Faith with a political position. That's totally wrong bro. Following Christ is deeply intimate and PERSONAL. We shouldn't politicize it.

[Aquila]

Personally, I'm not "for" gay marriage.

However, I am for a free society.

Freedom itself is sacred.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by DAII

You obviously are a poster of child for Attention Deficit Disorder.
You been sold a bag of goods and are trying to pass it off to an astute group of forum posters.

Caveat emptor.

Could you tell us what a rouse is?
More name calling? How in the world can people be diagnosed with ADD for catching you in a falsehood. ADD and ADHD are ideas people like yourself toss around that don't understand psychology.

Histrionic personality disorders create a maladaptive pattern of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as is exhibited in homosexuality. ADD is a behavior difficulty.