I will admit that I read her post, didn't read for a while and then jumped back into the thread, so is she purposefully led anyone a different direction she will have to answer for that herself.
I had assumed you hadn't followed the flow of the thread.
Here's the deal. (And I'm trying to be unbiased. )
I don't think anyone really thinks Rhoni was endorsing premarital sex. Well, maybe a couple of people were making SURE that wasn't what she meant...because for a moment there she made it sound like it was no big deal.
HOWEVER, most reasonable people, when confronted with "Lover? Do you mean it in the most COMMON context? Really?" will respond with something REASONABLE, like, "No, I didn't mean it THAT way, but I probably could have chosen a better word. Sorry about that."
The stubbornness, deliberate obtuseness, and refusal to accept that she led anyone in the wrong direction (purposely or not) is unnecessary, annoying, and really makes people want to press the point--including me.
There you go. That's me, being fair and balanced. (or not)
I had assumed you hadn't followed the flow of the thread.
Hard to say what conclusion I would come to otherwise. Rhoni does start annoying threads for sport. However, ya'll love every minute of it and say you are annoyed.
__________________
Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it. ~Chinese Proverb
When I was young and clever, I wanted to change the world. Now that I am older and wiser, I strive to change myself. ~
)
Linear Mode
